The South didn't weasel -- the States' acts were public and sovereign, taken in broad daylight. What's weaseling about that?
I don't assume the North broke the Constitution, although Lincoln may have a few times -- in pursuit of a higher good no doubt. What I've written several times is that the North rewrote the Constitution and inserted what we may happily call the unwritten Blood Clause, which I will summarize for you:
Amendment XIIIb
1. The States shall no longer be Sovereign, nor their Peoples have rights except those stipulated in the Constitution. They may not agree to any Thing unless the Congress or the President set it before them. The Congress may legislate at will on any subject whatsoever, and the Executive make Orders on discretion, and all shall have the force of law.
2. The subjugated people of the South shall be subordinate and their rights subject to modification or abrogation by public law, executive order, or the decree of any Federal Court.
stupidity doesn't run on my side of the argument.
Are you sure? You just made that post above about "weaseling".
You didn't answer the question, but it isn't going away.
Do you think ratification made the States the prey of the Supreme Court and whatever SCOTUS decided to rule, and whatever Congress decided to legislate? That the federal government can do to any State any thing it pleases, and to all the people that live in it?