Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life T-Shirts Banned on Golden Gate Bridge
EWTN ^ | 5/23/02

Posted on 05/23/2002 9:24:02 AM PDT by marshmallow

WASHINGTON DC, (LSN.ca/CWNews.com) - Crossroads, a youth pro-life wing of American Life League which walks across the US to herald the pro-life message, was stopped from crossing the Golden Gate bridge in San Francisco. Crossroads kicked off its annual pilgrimage Monday.

Crossroads was begun in the early 90s by students at Franciscan University of Steubenville and now each summer, pro-life college students walk across the country, pray at abortion facilities, speak at churches, and host town hall meetings to educate the public about abortion.

Leaving from San Francisco and heading to Toronto, the walkers approached the Golden Gate bridge. As the walkers were crossing the bridge, bridge patrol officers stopped them. According to the patrol, the walkers' T-shirts are not allowed on the bridge. On the front, the T-shirts read "Pro-Life." An American flag is on the back.

The walkers were informed that the pro-life shirts are a form of political protest. If the walkers didn't comply with the request to desist, they could be punished with a $10,000 fine and a year in jail.

Adam Redmon, director of Crossroads, commented "Officers ordered our team members-- who were wearing pro-life T-shirts-- to remove their shirts. America is pro-life, and pro-life Americans should not be targeted for discrimination -- especially in the San Francisco Bay area, where the right to free expression is held in high regard." Redmon says the group is planning legal action so as to stem such discrimination.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 05/23/2002 9:24:03 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
They should have all kept on walking...
2 posted on 05/23/2002 9:27:51 AM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Um, where's the ACLU on this one?
3 posted on 05/23/2002 9:29:09 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
BTW, makes one want to get a big ole "I'M PRO-LIFE" tattoo across the back doesn't it? What are the police going to do then? Skin us?
4 posted on 05/23/2002 9:30:33 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
They should have all kept on walking...

They should have brought their baseball bats with them as well.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment XIV

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

5 posted on 05/23/2002 9:32:50 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The walkers were informed that the pro-life shirts are a form of political protest.

Who put King George in charge?

And they call the right "fascist"! Sick people.
6 posted on 05/23/2002 9:33:04 AM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
How about that First Amendment, for an official it's sure handy.
Deny it to one group, and for the other it's just dandy.
7 posted on 05/23/2002 9:33:10 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
The walkers were informed that the pro-life shirts are a form of political protest. If the walkers didn't comply with the request to desist, they could be punished with a $10,000 fine and a year in jail.

Is there some ordinance that prohibits any protesting on the bridge? Wouldn't surprise me if there was, to prevent protesters from blocking it. - If so, it sounds like they are not singled out for discrimination.

8 posted on 05/23/2002 9:33:13 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Is there some ordinance that prohibits any protesting on the bridge?

If there is, it must be enforced equally, and there must be a strict, compelling governmental purpose for having it. My guess is that there is an ordinance, but the bridge officers like to selectively enforce it - only against groups that they know won't raise a violent fuss.
9 posted on 05/23/2002 9:36:31 AM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Do they stop all the cars with pro-choice bumper stickers?
10 posted on 05/23/2002 9:37:08 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: July 4th;Dakmar
Well, if one is cynical, one could assume that they selectively enforce the ordinance (and we still don't know for sure there is one - that was my question)

However, I would imagine that they are not selective about stopping disruptions and protests on the bridge. I am going to guess that the police take a dim view of all points of view that choose the bridge as a place to announce it.

I am not taking sides on this... I commented because the "political protests" are not inherently illegal and subject to the stiff penalty mentioned... but disrupting traffic on the bridge might be. If they have written an ordinance about the bridge, it would apply to all, not just "our side"... and we should at least be honest about what happened and not assume we have been victimized until we know for sure.

11 posted on 05/23/2002 9:46:50 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Yea I am sure they stop all the cars cover with left wing bumper stickers you see in the bay area from crossing the bridge too!
12 posted on 05/23/2002 9:53:47 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Apparently San Fransisco is no longer familiar with the first amendment.
13 posted on 05/23/2002 9:56:49 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
What you should do is have a few members go back the next weekend with pro-liberal slanted T-shirts " Up with Whales" or "Kill Republicans" and such (get a variety and don't all try to go over the bridge at once). Take along a video camera and record which T-shirts are acceptable and which are not. Once you establish on tape which type of T-shirts are okay and which are not you should have a court case.
14 posted on 05/23/2002 10:04:48 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Um, where's the ACLU on this one?

The American Criminal Lover's Union is too busy ensuring that real criminals don't go to jail, so they are better able to prey on society. They're also making sure that NAMBLA members can have their way with young boys. And, of course, they're also busy making sure that homosexuals get preferential treatment. So don't expect them to have time to attend to something as trivial as a First Amendment issue.

15 posted on 05/23/2002 10:06:39 AM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Every liberal is a fascist thug.
16 posted on 05/23/2002 10:10:47 AM PDT by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ln smithee
What's the situation out there, LN? Are protests on the bridge a commonplace event?
17 posted on 05/23/2002 10:11:55 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
If there is, it must be enforced equally

Well, one individual with such a T-shirt probably wouldn't seem to be a protest -- but when you have a large group ...

18 posted on 05/23/2002 10:16:18 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury
19 posted on 05/23/2002 10:16:38 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: techcor
get a variety and don't all try to go over the bridge at once

Then it isn't an organized protest or a disruption. That is the point. No one has the right to disrupt traffic on the bridge to make a political statement.

If this were about a liberal cause that was kicked off the bridge, we would be cheering for the rights of the commuters who are trying to get to work. Every nut with a cause does not have the right to shut down the Golden Gate, and neither do we.

We have to be smarter.

20 posted on 05/23/2002 10:17:05 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson