Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yikes; all
I'm not sure her walkman necessarily reveals anything about the purpose of her trip, nor does her outfit.

More telling is that her walkman wasn't taken, suggesting a targeted murder, a serial attacker doing so for thrills, or her stumbling onto a situation(such as a drug deal) that gave someone a reason to risk killing her(perhaps even unintentional, as in a hasty reaction).

Question to all: Why were her remains found over a large area? Results of animals, erosion, or purposeful dismembering?

355 posted on 05/23/2002 2:27:13 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat
animals and elements
374 posted on 05/23/2002 2:37:54 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
animals, as far as "remains" were scattered. But remember, it was her CLOTHING and POSSESSIONS that were scattered over the area the size of a small city building-lot, in a very large forested and thicketed park.

A better question would be, how did all those clothes get off of her and away from the body? More likely they were never on it in the first place, just dumped somewhere near it to make it look like an attack on a jogger.

This body was dumped there, Chandra would never have gone back in that area with anybody, not Gary, not at all, in her life time.

466 posted on 05/23/2002 4:45:19 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson