Replies

Though the perp claimed to have been trying to steal their walkmans, he is merely lying. He clearly targeted women wearing walkmans since they were easier to sneak up on and attack.

And with Chandra probably wearing a walkman, this made her a potential target of this perp.

Could be. But what are the chances that the perp would target walkers wearing walkmans so as to make off with their walkmans? Like the sentencing Judge said, this was very bizarre behavior. The Judge's instincts were probably sound: there was more going on in the perp's mind. Maybe rape. But in broad daylight? Robbery? Most walker/joggers don't carry a lot of valuables. This idiot could be a "Darwin Award" candidate. Who Knows. But the theory is too flimsey when compared with the circumstancial case regarding Condit's risk vis the relationship that had happened between he and Chandra. IMHO. Cheers.

The other two women were attacked at 7:00 - 7:30 pm. Crystalk posted earlier that the park closes at 6:00 p.m., (she lives in the area).

By the DC police/FBI best estimates, all activity ceased for Chandra as far as any identifiable trail about 1:00 p.m. when she logged off her computer. The time of day doesn't fit with this guy either. He planned his other attacks for after the park closed when there would be less chance of encountering anybody else.