I know that I shouldn't do this as you've already shown yourself to be unteachable (and if you read all my posts this is the very first thing I've said about you)
lets look at my post for facts. 1. The dem platform is pro-abortion and pro-homosexual. do you dispute that. 2. a pro-life dem senator by claiming to be a dem senator gives control of the senate to the anti-life party (the dems).
Lets look at logic. 1. See number two under facts. 2. my entire post is based on logic. If someone supports a party they, by their support of that party, support that parties goals and agenda. This seems perfectly logical to me.
Lets look at ad hominem attacks. You'll have to help me out here. Where did I attack anyone involved in this discussion? I didn't. Therefore no ad hominem attacks.
I don't expect a reasoned response But I had to try one more time.
GSA(P)
You attacked Paul Vallas, you attacked all Democrats and now you have attacked me. You lied about them, you addressed them instead of ideas or events and that is ad-hominem despite your contention that the attack has to be on the poster.
lets look at my post for facts. 1. The dem platform is pro-abortion and pro-homosexual. do you dispute that.
It is irrelevant to your attacks.
2. a pro-life dem senator by claiming to be a dem senator gives control of the senate to the anti-life party (the dems).
Irrelevant and off topic.
Lets look at logic. 1. See number two under facts.
You gave no facts in your earlier posts, only opinions. You now try to add some "facts" which are off topic and hope no one will notice, BZZZT, wrong.
2. my entire post is based on logic.
Illogic. Your opinion, and incorrect in any case.
If someone supports a party they, by their support of that party, support that parties goals and agenda. This seems perfectly logical to me.
It would seem logical to you. It is nonsense.
Lets look at ad hominem attacks. You'll have to help me out here. Where did I attack anyone involved in this discussion? I didn't.
See above examples
Therefore no ad hominem attacks.
Nice try.
I don't expect a reasoned response But I had to try one more time.
Save the bandwidth, you wouldn't know reason if it hit you in the face. And that IS an ad-hominem.
The main truth of the matter is that you said that Paul Vallas supports abortion and homosexuality. Then you made this convoluted attempt to link all Democrats to abortion and homosexuality. Lies, pure and simple. Moronic
I'm just guessing that you are one of those who condemns third parties and advocates changing the Republican party from within. Am I right about that?