[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

There are too many liberal kooks in general on just about all of the relevant diocesan committees making decisions on Catholic life. You have to ask the question - who is involved in selecting anti-Catholic kooks to make decisions for the Church? Hmmmmm... An interesting question indeed.

[Siobhan]

You've got that spot on! Who indeed. Did you ever read the supposed Memoirs of an Anti-Apostle? When I see things like this and your observation, I think the answer must be in such anti-apostles inserted into the Catholic Church by the Soviets.

[Askel5]

You have to ask the question - who is involved in selecting anti-Catholic kooks to make decisions for the Church? Hmmmmm... An interesting question indeed.

Who funded the stealth conferences on contraception at Notre Dame in the sixties, made Hesburgh a board member and gave select Catholics their talking points for refusing to "impose their values" on a State bent on birth control and abortion as part of Population Control?

Who funded the pilot program of "encounter groups" and "sensitivity training" used first on Catholic religious and then turned on the population at large?

Who funded the criminal Kinsey and legitimized his research -- including the Table 34 data -- making him the bedrock of sexual sociological and psychological theory in the US?

The Interlock (primarily Rockefellers) of WASP Anglophile Elite ... the same Breeders and Betting Men who field the horses (both fleet and dark) from which we choose each election year.

I have to admit ... E. Michael Jones's "Libido Dominandi Sexual Liberation and Political Control" has been a real eye-opener for me.

The most interesting part, of course, being how the Useful Idiots evidently think that their steadying the course with Legal Abortion and widespread birth control (not to mention the Ubiquitious "Family Values" and the American Public's willingness to support a President who speaks in terms of "already been killed" and "Excess" human lives) will allow them to succeed where the first two sexual revolutions failed.

[Askel5]

These would be the same ding-dongs who dog-eared their copies of Blanshard's books on the Vatican's similarity to the Kremlin etc. etc.

I happened to be reading one of those, actually, when I came across the Blanshard reference in the Jones book with regard to some Supreme Court justice or another.

Probably Justice Pet Rocks & Potential Personhood Douglas or some other of the Points of Light we've had guiding us from the bench as the State bulldozed God out of the schools, "liberated" us to utter enslavement to the passions by which they control us.