SECOND AMENDMENT CALL TO ACTION: EMERSON CASE

Seniors United Supportinh the Second Amendment ^

[dalebert]

bump

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the heads up!

[Soul Citizen]

best bump!

[tahiti]

I am never sarcastic about rights.

[OldEagle]

Please don't be offended, I'm just a country boy and I can't see why you could do what Emerson's defense team can't.

[tahiti]

The short answer is all forms of governments in the U.S. violate our rights, daily. But that does not mean we still do not have the rights.

The long answer is we have to exert our rights.

Don't wear a seat belt.

Smoke on public property. As to private property, you will have ask the owner for permission.

Drive an auto with a can of beer between your legs.

Another way to exert your rights, without "breaking laws," as an attorney advised me, is to seek an injunction against those who would enforce such laws.

That is my intention.

[4CJ]

FMCDH bump.

[SUSSA]

No offense taken. The purpose of amicus briefs is to add to the arguments presented by your side. In every major case there are several amicus briefs on both sides. You can be sure HCI will file an amicus brief, as will other anti-Bill of Rights extremists.

If amicus briefs were not effective, no group would go to the trouble and expense of preparing them and filing them. The fact that every side of an argument files briefs shows that they are important. It's hard to know for sure if a brief does any good. However, it is always better to be in the fight than to watch from the sidelines.

This is a chance to add our voice to the chorus of voices the Court will hear. It is an opportunity to be sure the Justices get as much information on our side as they get from the radical anti-Bill of Rights side. It may be our best chance of restoring our Second Amendment rights. We may not get another chance if the Court goes the wrong way.

[ScreamingFist]

Keeping you bumped SUSSA!

[SUSSA]

Thanks very much!!

[SUSSA]

btt