And ... how do you know it isn't?? Do you have inside information?? I didn't think so! Go whine somewhere else, okay!!
And ... how do you know it isn't??
Easy. Because you can't point to ONE indication that an investigation of ANY of the serious crimes committed by the democRATS while Clinton was in power has or is occuring. NOT ONE. You should be able to, given the scope of the investigation that is needed. HUNDREDS of people need to be questioned and many of those will be unfriendly ... people that would lawyer up at the first whiff of an investigation. Their lawyers, being lawyers, would run to a liberal press and liberal congress and cry foul. But that hasn't happened, has it? And some of those who need to be interviewed would be people like Tripp ... i.e., on our side ... and you can't with a straight face tell us that at least one of those DOZENS of people wouldn't have let slip that they'd been questioned by now. But that hasn't happened, has it? And an honest investigation would require that THOUSANDS of documents be subpoenoed and hundreds of computers be searched. And there is no way such an huge investigation could be kept quiet for long. You can't name ONE example from the past where that happened ... certainly in a case as large as this would be. Sorry ... but claiming I don't "know" for a fact that such an investigation is taking place ... after more than a year in office for Bush ... is no different than the delay, delay, delay tactics of the democRATS. More and more, it looks like there is not a dimes bit of difference between democRATS and Republicans where upholding the law where political parties and politicians is concerned.