Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If the Yahoo Link disappears, we can find the entire story HERE
1 posted on 05/29/2002 7:09:39 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; JohnHuang2 ...
Each year, secondhand smoke in the United States is responsible for an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 deaths from heart disease in people who are not smokers.

Here we go with those FIGURES again!

SHOW ME THE DEATH CERTIFICATES PLEASE!

2 posted on 05/29/2002 7:12:31 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Sounds Like another State going to Socialism, and how many more thereafter and then what are they going to take away from us our Guns, Cars, and etc-etc-etc.
4 posted on 05/29/2002 7:27:19 AM PDT by Wave Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, which means there's sufficient evidence that it causes cancer in humans, according to the American Cancer Society (news - web sites). The EPA has given the Group A designation to only 15 other pollutants, including asbestos, radon and benzene.
Each year, secondhand smoke in the United States is responsible for an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 deaths from heart disease in people who are not smokers. It's also to blame for about 3,000 lung cancer deaths in nonsmoking adults, and 150,000 to 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in children younger than 18 months of age, the American Cancer Society says.
The 1986 Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking declared that secondhand smoke causes disease, including lung cancer, in healthy nonsmokers.
And when compared with the children of nonsmoking parents, children of parents who smoke have more frequent respiratory infections, more respiratory problems, and slower development of lung function as the lung matures.
The U.S. Surgeon General's report also found that separating smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may reduce, but does not eliminate, the exposure to nonsmokers of secondhand smoke.

Where to begin?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen

And the federal judiciary system has already called them on this little "fact".

Each year, secondhand smoke in the United States is responsible for an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 deaths from heart disease in people who are not smokers. It's also to blame for about 3,000 lung cancer deaths in nonsmoking adults, and 150,000 to 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in children younger than 18 months of age, the American Cancer Society says.

Here we go with the figures but no supporting evidence, much less proof!

The 1986 Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking declared that secondhand smoke causes disease, including lung cancer, in healthy nonsmokers.

Again, where is the proof? And what about the lung cancer for people that are NOT smokers or exposed to ETS. Where does THAT come from? Enquiring minds want to know.

The U.S. Surgeon General's report also found that separating smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may reduce, but does not eliminate, the exposure to nonsmokers of secondhand smoke.

DUHH... Exposure does NOT mean harm.

5 posted on 05/29/2002 7:27:24 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
This will be a boon for restaurants and bars just across the state lines in PA and MD. People will let their money do the talking.

I remember standing outside Atlanta's airport one day between flights having a smoke and sharing an ashtray with another pax - who'd tried to light up in one of the airport's many BARS. Informed that the bars were non-smoking, the guy came outside - sans drink - to light up. He said he told the barkeep,

"If I can't smoke, WHY WOULD I WANT TO DRINK??"

Michael

6 posted on 05/29/2002 7:27:46 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
"If I can't enjoy a cup of coffee with a cigarette, I won't go out to eat," says Mary T. Gaworski.

What she really means is:
If I can't won't enjoy a cup of coffee with a cigarette, I won't can't go out to eat,"

That's the typical way selfish, inconsiderate smokers show their strong support for unwitting property owners and their "rights".

Hypocrites.

7 posted on 05/29/2002 7:28:13 AM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Screw the idiots in Delaware. I don't smoke, but I defend the right of anybody to participate in a legal activity.
8 posted on 05/29/2002 7:29:07 AM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Smokers who insist on smoking around people who don't want them to do so are evil -- but the gov't has no business telling private restaurants whether or not they can allow smoking.
13 posted on 05/29/2002 7:38:05 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, which means there's sufficient evidence that it causes cancer in humans, according to the American Cancer Society (news - web sites). The EPA has given the Group A designation to only 15 other pollutants, including asbestos, radon and benzene.

And a federal court overturned it in 1998, because the EPA violated their own rules and regulations as well as violating the Radon ACT.

14 posted on 05/29/2002 7:38:24 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
What right does the state have to ban smoking in casinos located on Indian Reservations, which are in effect soverign nations?

If I was the tribe leader I would tell Del. to go suck it.

And one thing I do not understand, since Reservations are NOT subject to US law, why do they need permission to open casinos on their land?

18 posted on 05/29/2002 7:41:43 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Vote with your feet. Don't spend a dime in Delaware.
33 posted on 05/29/2002 8:30:13 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
OK, now that Delaware has beaten down smokers, what's next on the agenda?

Let's incorporate a sin tax for junk food since it's recently been made known that obesity is as high a risk for health problems as smoking.

Maybe restaurants and bars should add a surcharge to the bills of overweight people who come in, especially if they have thoses "all you can eat" buffet tables.

Oh, and let's apply a higher tax to activities such as bungee jumping, ATV riding, skiing, etc. because when devotees of these pasttimes get in accidents, they miss work and that adds to the cost of doing business, don't you know. Plus, if they are permanently disabled, then they can get SSI and that affects other taxpayers.

35 posted on 05/29/2002 8:42:33 AM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
I just fired this off to HealthScout:

Dennis Thompson is being disingenuous with his use of statistics regarding SHS. If Thompson is a real reporter, he KNOWS that the EPA study classifying Second Hand Smoke as a Group A carcinogen has been vacated by a Federal Judge whose decision can be read in its entirety here: http://www.forces.org/evidence/epafraud/files/osteen.htm.

The American Cancer Society knows this also but has so far refused to remove the figures of the EPA study from their website even though a court has adjudicated them false.

Mr. Thompson also relies on the 1986 Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking which itself used the same unscientific methodology as the EPA and has since been discredited by the 1996 World Health Organizations SHS report, the largest study of its kind ever, which comes to the exact opposite conclusion

If a publication such as yours is striving for acceptance as an honest voice in the health care field, you should have the integrity to print the truth and not the half-baked claims of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or people who simply don't like smoking.

Thank you,
metesky
Moosegrin Falls, Maine
(Real name and address deleted to protect the guilty.)

36 posted on 05/29/2002 8:43:29 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
including bars, restaurants and casinos.

California already has banned smoking in these places. In fact some cities, such as Palo Alto, have ordinances banning smoking within 20 feet of the entrance to a business establishment.

39 posted on 05/29/2002 8:52:20 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
How is it possible for Delaware to regulate anything on an Indian reservation? Reservations are autonomous regions not beholden to the state.
50 posted on 05/29/2002 9:17:22 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Reiner put River Phoenix in his movie, Stand By Me, and had him smoke throughout, Phoenix was only 14 years old.

Secondary violence is much more harmful - SUPPORT THE DINGBAT-MEATHEAD BILL - STOP INDOOR MOVIE AND TV VIEWING NOW!
84 posted on 05/29/2002 11:55:23 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson