[nightdriver]

I appreciate Doug Powers calling them the DEMOCRAT candidates instead of the much-used and incorrect democratIC candidates. Just a comment.

[altair]

Kerry gets a six, but Hillary! only gets a five? Whatever, but I've certainly lost my appetite for ketchup.

[steve-b]

Lyndon LaRouche — At 81, LaRouche's shoe still rings, but he hears it less and less. I give him a chance of zero. Yes Lyndon, you're about to be framed yet again.

n.b. No opportunity to remind people of Loony Lyndon's Democrat affiliation should be missed.

[South40]

[WrightOnTarget]

I wonder who is going to be the dem nominee. Funny column.

[Senator_Palpatine]

>>>>>In Part I we explored the chances of nomination of Hillary Clinton, Tom Daschle, Al Gore, Robert Reich, and Jesse Jackson and ranked their probability on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the best chance of being nominated. So far Daschle's in the lead with a generous seven but we still have many more to go. My prediction for the party's nominee will be saved for the last part in this series. Figuring out who the nominee will be is like going to a "Facts of Life" reunion show cast party and trying to decide which girl to slow dance with; plenty to choose from, but no real desirable option.>>>>>>

"Enter the Democrats the true Rulers of the Republic.... The Republic is not what it once was-the Senate is full of greedy squabbling delegates.There is no interest in the common good.If I'm elected I promise to put an end to corruption.I feel confident our situation will create a strong sympathy vote for us.....Now they will elect an new Chancellor-a strong Chancellor..one who will not let our tragedy continue."

[GulliverSwift]

This article is full of spelling mistakes and inaccurately states that John Kerry is from Connecticut. If I remember correctly, toogoodreports was saying gwb would win it big in the electoral and popular votes in 2000. I'd give it a two.