Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LarryLied
Oh brother ... you must be joking.

It's practically illegal to give a bad reference. I don't think you can offer information like that. If the organization had specifically asked if the guy had embezzled, I think they'd be within their rights to say "Yes" and that's about it.

I'm sure we could get a labor lawyer in here to correct me but I believe it's part of the Title legislation protecting Stupid People, thieves, insane people and fang-tooth bitches who file frivolous lawsuits against their employers ... stuff like that.

It's like using c-notes to scrape the gum from the bottom of your crepe sole shoe in the middle of July to get rid of the employee in the first place and then you're generally precluded from giving him a bad reference.

5 posted on 05/31/2002 8:16:03 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5
They had him sign a contract to pay the money back so I don't see how mentioning the $400,000 he took would be grounds for anything. But what do I know. Maybe a lawyer will, as you suggest, enlighten us.

His lawyer was on TV this evening and said there was nothing in the contract preventing the diocese from telling anyone what Schattie did (think he was shifting the blame for the JCC fraud from his client to the Church).

6 posted on 05/31/2002 8:25:38 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson