Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama Family Recovers Land Taken by State Decades Ago
Associated Press ^ | Published: Jun 1, 2002 | By Bill Poovey Associated Press Writer

Posted on 06/01/2002 5:17:47 AM PDT by krodriguesdc

Alabama Family Recovers Land Taken by State Decades Ago

By Bill Poovey Associated Press Writer Published: Jun 1, 2002

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - A black family whose land was seized by the state under a 1964 court order can return to the farm as its "rightful owners," Gov. Don Siegelman said. Siegelman transferred ownership of the land to the family Friday, saying it had been taken "by a legal technicality." The family had said for nearly 40 years that the land was rightfully theirs.

"It is a great moment for the family but equally it is a great moment for the state of Alabama," state Sen. Hank Sanders said Friday.

Siegelman reviewed the land-taking claim by Willie Williams of Sweet Water after it was detailed in an Associated Press story. In December, an AP series documented the loss of 24,000 acres by black Americans, through violence, trickery and legal maneuvers. The series, "Torn From the Land," uncovered 107 land takings during an 18-month investigation.

"Thank you for bringing this matter to the public's attention," Siegelman said while signing what he described as an unprecedented land grant by an Alabama governor.

The Williams family lost the western Alabama land after the state claimed the property belonged to the government because of a 1906 federal designation as swampland.

Williams was not immediately available for comment Friday.

The property is now vacant and overgrown. Some of it has been opened to timber cutters, state records show.

The AP reported that the family held an 1874 deed and had records to show they had been paying taxes on the land for generations. Records show that a judge in 1965 said allowing the state's claim would create a "severe injustice," but nonetheless signed an order giving the property to the state.

Williams' great-grandfather, named George Washington, bought 240 acres in 1874. The purchase and his conveyance of the land to his children in 1900 are documented in well-preserved, handwritten courthouse records.

State officials secured "quiet title" to the 40 acres Williams' father inherited, based on a 1963 U.S. Bureau of Land Management notice. That notice said a 1906 federal patent classified the Washington property as swampland owned by the state.

Then-Circuit Judge Emmett F. Hildreth wrote in a Dec. 13, 1965, letter to state conservation officials that evidence showed the families had "been in possession of these lands about three generations. The effect of a decree favorable to the state of Alabama would be to dispossess these people and deprive them of these lands. Such action would create a severe injustice."

Letters and internal memos on the case in files of the State Lands Division in Montgomery are peppered with references to the family's race. They show officials adamantly opposed allowing "the negro defendants" to keep the land, even while acknowledging that the family could trace its ownership back to 1874.

In 1967, Hildreth, who is now dead, signed a decree awarding ownership to the state, but allowing Williams' father, Lemon Williams, and his wife to remain on the property as long as they lived.

Willie Williams, 51, said that up to his death in 1983, his father was still pleading for the family not to give up trying to reclaim ownership of the land, where they grew beans and cotton.

Siegelman said that "when George Washington bought this property he did everything a reasonable person would have done, got a title and paid his taxes."

---

On the Net:

The AP series can be found at: http://wire.ap.org

Alabama Legislature: House Joint Resolution 54 at http://www.legislature.state.al.us

AP-ES-06-01-02 0529EDT



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: landgrab; landreturned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/01/2002 5:17:47 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; maknight; South40; condolinda; mafree; trueblackman; FRlurker...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

2 posted on 06/01/2002 5:18:41 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
I'm happy for the family that they got ownership of their land back. It's sad that ownership of the land was ever taken away from them and that it took so long for justice to prevail.
3 posted on 06/01/2002 5:30:28 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
This is but a small bit of justice for the Williams family. Institutionalized discrimination and trickery was used to steal their land from them. Now that they have it back, the state should be bearing the financial obligation to return it to the condition it was in when the land was seized, IMO.

This is a basic property rights issue in my opinion. One small victory in the battle of property owners vs. the oppressive federal government's land grabbing tactics, IMO. We need tens of THOUSANDS of more cases like this!

4 posted on 06/01/2002 5:32:46 AM PDT by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
"Now that they have it back, the state should be bearing the financial obligation to return it to the condition it was in when the land was seized, IMO."

The government should do more than that. It should pay these people for the profits they could have earned from the use of the land plus 40+ years of interest.

5 posted on 06/01/2002 5:40:04 AM PDT by libertylover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
You are absolutely correct. I missed that point. Thank you.
6 posted on 06/01/2002 5:41:24 AM PDT by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
An early land grab by eco-freaks. Swampland indeed, they grew beans and cotton on it.
7 posted on 06/01/2002 5:43:17 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc;landgrab
For once, I'm happy to add to this index:

landgrab:

To find all articles tagged or indexed using landgrab, click below:
  click here >>> landgrab <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)


8 posted on 06/01/2002 5:48:09 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
The government should do more than that. It should pay these people for the profits they could have earned from the use of the land plus 40+ years of interest.

Well stated. Note, however, that Lemon Williams retained possesion of the land until his death in 1983. His son says that he continued to grow beans and cotton until then. Not an exculpation of federal and state crimes, but it has bearing on damages perhaps owed.

9 posted on 06/01/2002 5:48:27 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: usconservative;mhking
us; it was the state government that took this land using an obscure federal law for their excuse.

mh; I've always blamed these damn cracker southern governments for putting us in the position we are today concerning our rights of free association. If they had protected all of their citizens back then, the feds never would have been able to step in.

10 posted on 06/01/2002 5:55:40 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Now to really stir the pot up, you notice that Jesse Jackson and the rest of the racial warlords are nowhere to be seen in regards to a true case of injustice?
11 posted on 06/01/2002 6:22:51 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
Don't you love it when something works to protect the people from the government as the Founders intended?
12 posted on 06/01/2002 6:27:22 AM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
I so agree with you! Wonder how long the patent will last though????
13 posted on 06/01/2002 6:34:34 AM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: newriverSister, sauropod
ping
14 posted on 06/01/2002 6:48:38 AM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Wonder how long the patent will last though????

Is forever long enough for you?

15 posted on 06/01/2002 7:00:36 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking
About 18 years ago, the town of Murray, Utah forced an older couple to sell their small family farm to the city because the city deemed it a "flood plain." The poor woman was suffering from colon cancer at the time. The city used federal monies for the transaction. There has NEVER been a flood remotely near that land though it bordered the ditch known as the Jordan River. The City built a golf course out of it and is raking in lots of money. Never mind the city cooked their books for auditors. The couple found one dirty lawyer to help them get screwed by the city, then another lawyer that advised them not to sue the first lawyer -- “not worth throwing good money after bad.” Just one big stinking mess. It put both of these good people 6 feet under. The political crooks in Washington DC have nothing over the crooks in Murray.
16 posted on 06/01/2002 7:14:24 AM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
I don't think a "land patent" was used to convey this property. An "unprecedented land grant" was issued by the state according to the governor article. It's my understanding that only the Federal government issues or issued land patents.
17 posted on 06/01/2002 7:20:52 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EverOnward
That sounds like what the local 'officals' are trying to do to a family in Coatesville, Pa. Claim their farm to built a golf course and playing fields.
This story was posted a couple of days ago here.
18 posted on 06/01/2002 7:30:08 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
My land patent was signed by the then Governor of the Common Wealth of Va, James Munroe.
19 posted on 06/01/2002 7:31:08 AM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Now to really stir the pot up, you notice that Jesse Jackson and the rest of the racial warlords are nowhere to be seen in regards to a true case of injustice?

Hmmm. Maybe it's because Jesse would rather have another Budweiser distributorship than a couple of acres of farm land in Alabama ... ?

20 posted on 06/01/2002 7:47:27 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson