Replies

There is no evidence global warming poses a threat to the environment on the level required to justify the statism envisaged in the Kyoto Treaty. The Bush report is notable for hijacking the worst hysterical rantings of the enviro nazis. Well count me out: I won't allow conservatism to be hijacked in the name of fighting a threat no responsible scientist is sure even exists.

HELLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ... President Bush is NOT about to sign the Kyoto Treaty ! This is spin, pure and simple, by the N.Y. Times, Drudge out for sensationalism, and Rush being an idiot; still hunting for ratings, by bashing Bush.

If you read the report, it states that we should adapt to those things that cannot be changed, and that drastic measures (hint...that means Kyoto) are not the way to go.

If the scientific data proves that some warming is occurring, the intelligent thing to do would be to determine why, if there is anything that could be done to reverse the process, and what steps need to be taken to protect the safety of the country.

I would like to see the scientific data and a discussion of methodology for collecting it. For some reason, Rush Limbaugh does not seem to me to be well-versed in the sciences, and therefore his statements that there is no global warming have no more weight than the nut-case envirals who scream that there is.

The thing is, if there IS global warming, you want solutions that are conservative and pro-US. If there IS global warming occurring, shouting real loud that it isn't true isn't going to solve anything.

The Bush report is notable for hijacking the worst hysterical rantings of the enviro nazis.

You definitely did not read the report, because if you did, you would not be able to come to that conclusion.