Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
I still think there's a big difference between TWA 800 and AA 587. TWA 800 was almost certainly brought down by a missile. The published evidence is overwhelming. There have been no such smoking guns with AA 587. It could have been sabotage, but the witnesses didn't see any signs of a missile, and unlike that fishy center fuel tank story, there was considerable evidence of funny business at the French assembly plant, with prior delamination of the vertical tail assembly and a jury-rigged repair.

In other words, on the evidence so far, one case was a coverup and the other is still a mystery.

12 posted on 06/04/2002 5:28:36 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
True, but it is a hell of a mystery. Contrary to one poster's claim, the engines left the plane somewhat after it was thoroughly out of control, and were proabably ripped off by air load on the cowlings - same reason the tail came off.

It is also well-documented that Al Quaida ops experimented with improvised explosives. They killed a Japanese businessman and nearly crashed the whole plane in that case. Plus we have the recent shoe bomber. This flight was on its way to the Dominican Republic, and would have been carrying lots of very random stuff like small appliances and electronics for the folks back home. It would also be fairly easy for an African Moslem to pass for a Dominican (there were no obvious Moslems on the passenger list). Plus there is the timing (UNGA in town, Bush the day before)and location - almost within sight of the UN building and Ground Zero.

Then there is the direct evidence of coverup. Numerous bogus "explanations" were placed with the press, among them: Old engine (proved wrong), bird strike (proved wrong), wake turbulence (proved wrong), cheese (still in play), thrust reversers (proved wrong). The cheap French plastic tail theory is literally the "center fuel tank explosion" of this crash: No other plane was grounded because of this theory.

It may be a mystery, but when you have an explicit threat against airliners by terrorists, the likeliest solution is the one that came out and said "We will cause more airliner crashes."

15 posted on 07/07/2002 10:06:52 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson