Posted on 06/07/2002 9:59:28 AM PDT by Samizdat
Sometime last year, I think around May 23, Mark Fuhrman was on Paula Zahn. Here is that exchange.
Z: So I understand your next book may be on the suicide of Vince Foster?
F: No….
Z: Have you started to work on that, or not?
F: I've been researching and working on that in my spare time for almost three years now. Vince Foster will come. Not now.
Z: Do you think he was murdered?
F: Its interesting you say that. If he committed suicide, he didn't do it at Ft. Marcy Park. If they want it to be a suicide, the people that brought him there and staged the scene are going to have to come forward and state where he was and how he committed suicide. That's never going to happen.
So it will be a murder…it will be a suspicious murder for all time now. There's no other way to think about it. He didn't kill himself there. The evidence was not there for a man that shot himself through the mouth, that went out the back of his skull. There is no bone fragments, no skull, you know, piece of his skull, scalp. There was no blood splatter anywhere behind his head. There was an elevated area right behind his head. It would have been very evident, a warm summer day, clear, no moisture. Its ridiculous what they want us to believe at Ft. Marcy Park.
I have always been impressed with Furhman.
What was the solution?
There's no way that the protective cover will be withdrawn from Bill Clinton, at least not as things stand now.
I certainly agree that Foster was probably murdered, and certainly moved, and that there was a cover-up. But the cover-up involves the Justice Department, the FBI, and Starr as well as Clinton and his stooges. How can they possibly allow the investigation to be re-opened?
Also, who do you indict? Presumably either clinton or his wife gave the order to kill Foster, but it's unlikely that either of them committed the murder personally. So you would probably have to start by indicting people for faking the death certificate, losing the X-rays, falsifying testimony, and things like that. It would be very difficult.
Starr probably consented to the cover-up, not only because Reno appointed and he was a team player, but because he had to use the FBI to do the investigating and to offer him personal protection against assassination threats. That's a tough one.
Nevertheless, the evidence is overwhelming that Foster was murdered. I hope Fuhrman writes the book. Even if clinton is never prosecuted, it would be gratifying to see him end up like O.J., with everyone knowing he was guilty even though he got away with it.
Me too. Detective Fuhrman was harpooned by the incredibly incompetent prosecution team beginning with the DA, Garcetti, and aided and abetted by Marcia Clark and Chris Darden.
When asked if he'd ever used the "N" word, he should have simply replied: "Who Hasn't at one time or another!
Also, who do you indict? Presumably either clinton or his wife gave the order to kill Foster, but it's unlikely that either of them committed the murder personally. So you would probably have to start by indicting people for faking the death certificate, losing the X-rays, falsifying testimony, and things like that. It would be very difficult.
Starr probably consented to the cover-up, not only because Reno appointed and he was a team player, but because he had to use the FBI to do the investigating and to offer him personal protection against assassination threats. That's a tough one.
That is about as succinct an analysis as I seen yet on this whole scenario. You nailed it. However, if Fuhrman writes the book, that will put tremendous pressure on all involved. If justice is done, then many heads will roll. But so be it.
How can they stop it if Bush and Ashcroft say its so?
Also, who do you indict?
If an HONEST exhumation and autopsy comes back showing a bullet wound where none was supposed to be (as is one of the allegations in this matter), you start by indicting and convicting the doctor who files the false autopsy report. Then you work your way up ... perhaps by turning that doctor because I doubt he's going to want to go down alone.
So you would probably have to start by indicting people for faking the death certificate, losing the X-rays, falsifying testimony, and things like that. It would be very difficult.
That's how it would start in ANY case because you want to use the small fish to catch the big fish. And is "difficulty" a reason for not investigating this? And if the honest autopsy shows the doctors signed death certificate is untrue ... conviction isn't going to be all that hard, is it?
Nevertheless, the evidence is overwhelming that Foster was murdered. I hope Fuhrman writes the book. Even if clinton is never prosecuted, it would be gratifying to see him end up like O.J., with everyone knowing he was guilty even though he got away with it.
Agree. But I'd much rather there be an honest investigation in this and the Ron Brown death. If there isn't, that will say something very unpleasant about the Bush administration.
And what sweet justice that someone like Mark Furhman fought someone in the Kennedy family AND Mickey Mouse Sherman and WON!!!
Today renewed my faith in the Justce System....THANK YOU JURORS WITH BRAINS!!!
I would vote for Furhman investigating Ted Kennedy and a manslaughter/DWI/leaving-the-scene-of-a-crime charge. Now, wouldn't that be a sweet conviction.
Leviticus:
"Thou shalt not stand by the blood of thy brother"
This is what drives me on Foster. I hope it will drive you too, Mr. Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.