[anniegetyourgun]

Are you suggesting that the current administration will keep Furman from writing his book? What constitutional crisis is in the wings if he should publish his book? Perhaps I'm just being blonde, but I don't see anything in this that has anything to do with George W. Bush or his administration.

[stands2reason]

C'mon, you've seen the Slam Bush gymnastics before....

[cgbg]

What constitutional crisis is in the wings if he should publish his book? Perhaps I'm just being blonde, but I don't see anything in this that has anything to do with George W. Bush or his administration

I don't want to speak for the poster, but it is the view of some (probably including me, I confess) that Terry Reed's book "Compromised" is essentially accurate. In that book he alleges that Clinton as well as Bush42 and "two of the Bush sons" were heavily involved in the drug trade using CIA resources.

That would explain a lot of Arkancides, coverups by both political parties, etc.

There are more benign explanations for those events I suppose, but I haven't found any of them compelling. But, I will try to keep an open mind. :-)

[Revolting cat!]

Are you suggesting that the current administration will keep Furman from writing his book?

No, of course not! Fuhrman can and will write his book. What I'm asking is what is it going to lead to? All the questions that need to be asked about this case have been asked. Is he going to get answers to any of them? I seriously doubt it. Perhaps he can point out to some new discrepancies, some new evidence of the incompetence of the Park Police. To break this case answers would have to start coming from some of the principal players. Is Fuhrman going to get Tony and Craig to talk?