The White House: Allegations of Damage During the 2001 Presidential Transition.

GAO ^ | June 7, 2002 | GAO

[Republican_Strategist]

View the full report on Clinton vandalism at The White House: Allegations of Damage During the 2001 Presidential Transition.

Demand an apology from the left wingers who made a big fuss and accused conservatives of lying! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Below is a list of how liberals tried to shield and lie about the vandalism that took place.

What they said:

F.A.I.R. Action Alert: Irresistible Lies: Fox News on White House "Vandalism"

Dems to White House: Apologize!

Tony Snow responds to MWO's criticism about his journalistic vandalism

And Why Does Andrea Mitchell Still Have Her Job?

This is a Propaganda War from the Right...

Clinton aide denies reports of White House vandalism

What we said:

Media, Democrats Distort White House Vandalism Episode



I want to hear those apologies Democrats

[Republican_Strategist]

Other recent Clinton Scandals?

Clinton's Bin Laden GATE - Mother of all Scandals

Enrongate: A Democrat Scandal

[alnick]

I just called Weiner's office, spoke to the lady who answered the phone, and told her that Anthony Weiner owes the White House an apology. I reminded her that Weiner publicly demanded an apology from the White House when he accused them of lying about the vandalism perpetrated by the Clinton admin. I told her that since the GAO has investigated and documented $20,000 worth of damage, that Weiner should do the right thing and publicly apologize.

She was very polite, as was I. She took my name and address so that he could send me a written response. We'll see.

[passionfruit]

When the Dems were yelling "what did Bush know about the terrorists, and when did he know it?", I was wondering if the Clinton Whitehouse had made any effort to pass on what they knew to the new administration.

It seems that they didn't have any time to attend to those details. They were busy xeroxing their privates, prying the W's off of keyboards, making off with whitehouse treasures, and leaving pornography around.

What scum!

[Republican_Strategist]

Don't hold your breath..

[Republican_Strategist]

You know how that saying goes, "They are just putting the rat in democrat"

[Lee Heggy]

I'm not going to cast all Democrats in the same light as the scum the previous administration turned out to be and even amongst them I remain hopeful that there were some few who are decent even if deluded folks. The people who occupied the offices that were trashed are the ones who need to be held accountable.

[Republican_Strategist]

An awful lot of them deliberately lie to defend the scumbag and that says a lot.

[Mo1]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

[Republican_Strategist]

You know, I see the crime as being this: Clinton said if there were any damages that he was going to pay the cost. Oh, but Slick Willy is never held to his words. Well he doesn’t even pay his lawyers and he could never pay back what he cost America not only in money, but the devastation and havoc he caused. He’s decidedly the worst president in U.S. history. Down at the bottom with Jimmy Carter and FDR.

[katana]

Here's hoping for a House committee investigation and a few well placed Justice Department indictments during the next few months leading up to the elections. I have always hoped that the "new attitude" was a clever screen for simply biding our time till the right moment. If so, the next few months could be really interesting.

[ptlurking]

Go to pg.21 for the DemocRAT spin...

Because of the lack of definitive data available to compare the extent of damage, vandalism, and pranks during the 2001 transition with past transitions, we were unable to conclude whether the 2001 transition was worse than previous ones.

I'm sure this will be Peter Jenning's lead...

[w_over_w]

"Well he doesn’t even pay his lawyers and he could never pay back what he cost America not only in money, but the devastation and havoc he caused"

I believe his exact words were that his lawyer's should consider it an "honor" to have represented him and that would be their compensation. Using this logic should GW's administration consider it an "honor" to pay for damages to the Whitehouse? Clinton will always be living proof that even in America a dysfunctional, emotionally retarded con-artist can become president. BTW, Jimmy Carter's problem was a birth defect . . . he was born with no testicles.

[INSENSITIVE GUY]

SCR*W THE APOLOGIES!LET THE PROSECUTIONS BEGIN!

[swampfox98]

If you will remember, President Bush told us that there had been no damage done to the offices by Clinton's group, or nothing had been stolen from Airforce One. Who should we believe?

[Outraged]

I'm not going to cast all Democrats in the same light as the scum the previous administration turned out to be and even amongst them I remain hopeful that there were some few who are decent even if deluded folks. The people who occupied the offices that were trashed are the ones who need to be held accountable.

You don't need to cast them in the same light, but you do need to make sure they see the light of those who would deceive and manipulate them. The DNC is rotten and they perpetuate hate, lies, slander, scare tactics and dependency to achieve their EVIL goals. You have a duty to enlighten these sheep, those who do not listen are the evil byproduct who you must classify as the scum that runs the DNC to this day.

In my vast right wing opinion, that is.

[C7pilot]

Because of the lack of definitive data available to compare the extent of damage, vandalism, and pranks during the 2001 transition with past transitions, we were unable to conclude whether the 2001 transition was worse than previous ones.

"I'm sure this will be Peter Jenning's lead"

Yes, the Clintonistas have already jumped on that. The Democrat Rep. on CNN's "Crossfire" and his buddy "The Forehead" Begala were quoting that as evidence that nothing happened. That statement had to be dreamed up and inserted by a holdover Clintonite in the GAO. It is one of the most sophomoric and stupidly gratuituous "findings" I have ever heard - in my opinion designed specifically to let the Clintons off the hook.

Let's see, we can't form an opinion about this event because we haven't checked the last event that might in the remotest way be categorically comparable. What a piece of Bureaucratic doublespeak (garbage)!

[Republican_Strategist]

Err wrong. Let’s face it; you are just trying to dredge up this idea that republicans did the same thing. Bush 41 did not vandalize and loot the White House, Air Force One, etc. And as for the Enron Owns Democrats site, you didn’t bother taking one minute of your time to view anything on there. You have just allowed the liberal media portrayal and the bellicose liberal rhetoric to shape your perception of it.

And how about democrats criticizing Bush on terrorism? Oh, they forget how national security and defense issues were basically non-issues to them and in fact they weakened the two while they tried to claim an Aug. 6th briefing on possible methods based on 1998 information that mentioned hijacking to get fellow Al Qaeda captive released is the same as knowing 9-11 was going to happen only to see them retreat.

Basically you are ignorant of the points I raised on my web sites and you have this skewed, screwy equivalency.

So you've been a member since March 26, 2002? Are you one of those democreeps from Smirking Chimp lurking around Free Republic?

[Republican_Strategist]

Isn't that just wishful thinking on your part?