[tacticalogic]

If you are a "reactionary" it intimates that you are reacting to the opponent. If your opponent acts first you have lost the initiative. I want to be the one that acts first and make them 'react' to me.

Admittedly, that is going to take a while to be able to do. I still don't want to get into the mindset of 'reacting' when I should be initiating.

I think you're confusing "reactionary" with "reactive".

[Just another Joe]

I think you're confusing "reactionary" with "reactive".

Same root word, 'react'.
Not to quibble semantics, would you rather hit or be hit?