To: messiertom
The protestor probably took the *young* child so that the child wouldn't be left at home, alone, which would be child neglect. DU's don't act like spoiled babies; they act like caring parents.
Your answer is typical of a liberal. You don't take babies to protests which might become violent. You stay home WITH the baby. Geesh! The child's safety should come first! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
79 posted on
07/17/2002 5:15:10 PM PDT by
Jaidyn
To: Jaidyn
(sorry to ressurect an old thread... but I spend nearly no time here as I'm a progressive-type person)
This protest didn't need to turn "violent". If the Secret Service (bwaaa? I'm not blaming Bush for this) hadn't violently disrupted a peaceful, non-disruptive protest, there would have been no violence (and if the school hadn't supported this).
And, you seem to miss the point that this was a university graduation ceremony... I wouldn't miss my own graduation ceremony for the world.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson