Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fully Integrated Scramjet Missile Engine Tested at Mach 6.5
Navy Newsstand ^ | 16 June 2002 | Office of Naval Research Public Affairs

Posted on 06/16/2002 12:04:34 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

ARLINGTON, Va. (NNS) -- The Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) successfully conducted the first ground test of a full-scale, fully integrated hypersonic cruise missile engine using conventional liquid hydrocarbon fuel on May 30, 2002. The test, performed in a wind tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va., demonstrated robust operation of the engine at simulated hypersonic cruise conditions (Mach 6.5 at 90,000 feet altitude).

Demonstration of efficient supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet) performance with a liquid hydrocarbon fuel is an essential step to enabling a viable hypersonic cruise missile. The May 30 test is the first demonstration of net positive engine thrust for a fully installed, hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet missile engine. Additional tests are planned later this summer at the Arnold Engineering and Development Center, Arnold Air Force Base, Tenn., to verify operation at Mach 3.5 and 4 flight conditions, which will simulate the hypersonic engine taking over following a rocket boost.

The engine will be used in the four-year, joint ONR/DARPA Hypersonic Flight Demonstration program called HyFly. The objective of the HyFly program is to flight-test a missile demonstrator able to cruise at speeds of up to Mach 6 to a range of 600 nautical miles using liquid hydrocarbon fuel. The HyFly program is being performed by a team consisting of The Boeing Co. of St. Louis; Aerojet of Sacramento, Calif.; The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md.; and Naval Air Warfare Center at China Lake, Calif. The engine is a dual combustion ramjet engine developed by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory under ONR’s Hypersonic Weapon Technology program.

“HyFly’s objective is to mature the dual combustion ramjet-based hypersonic strike missile concept, through flight demonstration, in a weapon configuration that’s compatible with launch from surface ships and submarines as well as Navy and Air Force aircraft,” explained DARPA’s Preston Carter, program manager for HyFly.

The U.S. Navy’s Chief of Naval Research Rear Adm. Jay Cohen, and Anthony J. Tether, director of DARPA, in a joint statement noted, “The dual combustion ramjet engine concept is the enabling technology for a future high-speed strike weapon. A hypersonic strike weapon has the potential to transform our nation’s armed forces to meet future warfighting needs. HyFly is a leading element of DoD’s National Aerospace Initiative to demonstrate advanced hypersonic technologies.”

Developmental flight tests of the HyFly demonstrator vehicle start early in FY04 with demonstration of a surrogate submunition deployment planned for March 2004. The program plans to progress to powered flights at Mach 4 in November 2004, with Mach 6 flights starting a year later.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech; missile; scramjet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Cool.
1 posted on 06/16/2002 12:04:34 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: miltech
Ping!!
2 posted on 06/16/2002 12:04:50 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
DoD seems to have discovered the V1 buzbomb.
3 posted on 06/16/2002 12:10:43 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patton
DoD seems to have discovered the V1 buzbomb

At Mach 6 it would have crossed the distance from England to Germany in a few minutes and left NO warning.

Way to go DOD .... now make a decent missile of it.

4 posted on 06/16/2002 12:16:04 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
The speed is impressive, but I think that they were flying in the other direction...
5 posted on 06/16/2002 12:19:35 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The SR-71 Blackbird record is just over Mach 3... Mach 6.5 mean it could catch up to a Blackbird going all-out at a closing speed of Mach 3+... Dang, that's fast!
6 posted on 06/16/2002 12:24:14 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
This suckers a lot faster than the V1
7 posted on 06/16/2002 12:32:32 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Maybe we could make an Air to Ground launched missile that's firable from the SR-71.

Who needs stealth when you can outfly anything the nenemy can shoot at you.

8 posted on 06/16/2002 12:33:47 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
"Quantity has a quality all it's own..."...Churchill, I think.
9 posted on 06/16/2002 12:50:00 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
IIRC, one of the SR-71's first problems was the possibility of out-running it's ordnance.
This puppy would've solved that little dilemma.

and a Mach 3.2 platform pushing a Mach 6.5 missile would certainly give little advanced warning!

(Ahh, can't you just feel the testosterone flowing with these numbers floating around?)

10 posted on 06/16/2002 12:55:22 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Please Don't Make Me Use The Cat ..
We Are Almost there ...
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


Thank you Registered!
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

11 posted on 06/16/2002 12:56:40 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
I would love to see that weapon developed. Give it a low yield nuke for a warhead and there is no missile defense system that could stop an attack. It'd be a deadly trump card.
12 posted on 06/16/2002 1:25:23 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Re: the SR-71 speed record..................................................Don't bet on it. :)
13 posted on 06/16/2002 1:39:44 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Having worked for DOD support companies (Lear Siegler and Qualitron-Aero) in the past, I have been told by people who should know that the SR-71's top speed is much higher than Mach 3.

Supposedly every time the Russians or someone else would set a new record, they would fly the SR-71 just fast enough to set a new record.

I have also heard that they don't really know the absolute top speed. That because of the fact that the engines generate more power the faster they go, that they think the SR-71 would just go faster and faster until something breaks, melts, or blows up.

14 posted on 06/16/2002 1:50:45 PM PDT by chaosagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Didn't the Russians develop an ICBM that can travel extremely fast? IIRC that why they aren't afraid of our developing missile defense system. Anyway, good going DoD R&D!
15 posted on 06/16/2002 1:54:13 PM PDT by Loc123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
God bless Kelly's SkunkWorks!
16 posted on 06/16/2002 2:29:04 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
The SR71 had flameout problems that were cured by continously injecting pyrophoric liquid into the combustors during flight. That was the stuff that always used to leak out of them on the ground and burst into flame as it came in contact with the air.

In flight at Mach 3 and above the effective viscosity of air is like that of 30 weight motor oil. Not only is it hard to get it to flow through the engines and around the aircraft, but a flame out can decelerate the aircraft so hard that the pilots are turned into mush.

Burning kerosense in a scamjet is no small feat either. Unlike Hydrogen is has a relatively slow flame speed and can easily be self extinguished by a small change in mixture ratio.

If they have really done it then, Bravo. It took generations of research to get there.

17 posted on 06/16/2002 2:42:42 PM PDT by SSN558
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Re: the SR-71 speed record..................................................Don't bet on it.

I don’t know about the SR-71… My uncle was an air traffic controller in/around Reno. I don’t know exactly where, but he lived in Sparks at the time. He said the Air Force would routinely tell them they were flying planes through their area and to ignore them. He said you could mark their positions on the screen with a grease pencil as they flew through and then measure the distance traveled each sweep to approximate speed. I don’t remember exact numbers for exact planes, but I remember they (according to him) were flying much faster than what the Air Force admitted to…

18 posted on 06/16/2002 3:49:52 PM PDT by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patton
The speed is impressive, but I think that they were flying in the other direction...

True ...

19 posted on 06/16/2002 7:54:30 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
We rock.
20 posted on 06/16/2002 8:11:48 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson