Posted on 06/18/2002 7:19:53 AM PDT by Valin
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:36:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Sometimes, when liberals have sufficiently aggravated me with their morally superior tone, I threaten to write a book, and what I say I am going to call it is, "Killer Liberals." You'll know better where I'm coming from if I explain where I got the idea for the title. It's from "The Killer Angels," a marvelous 1974 novel about the Battle of Gettysburg by Michael Shaara.
(Excerpt) Read more at 24hour.startribune.com ...
The war on drugs is a premier example.
Conservatives have the edge over liberals in that, generally, they're willing to assess evidence that contradicts their beliefs in candor and honesty. Not all, but most.
Liberals' beliefs are more robustly protected by the "fact-proof screen" (Eric Hoffer), because their beliefs tend to be a consequence of a vision of themselves as more moral and caring than those who disagree with them: to use Thomas Sowell's phrase, "a vision of differential rectitude." Therefore, to admit that they were wrong involves lowering themselves from an exalted moral plane to equality (or worse) with the rest of us, which is for many of them unthinkable, a debasement not to be borne.
There's no cure yet... but there is hope.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
Thanks for posting this article. It has some really good examples of liberalism and its "do-good" mentality causing more harm than good.
I hope you're right.
J
An excellent read. Breathes life into tragic and heroic historic figures.
Do it! I'd buy that book!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.