I agree. The original summary judgement stays on the pages of the law books and wasn't overturned. It set a precedent, and others can now come after FR for the same reasons and demand the same thing: No full article posting.
It would be sheer stupidity for them to do it.
I' d bet less than half a dozen ever make such a request or demand.
I really expect the LA Times and Washington Post to remove the restriction because it is in their best interest to do so.