Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides; Nita Nupress; Uncle Bill; Sal; rdavis84; thinden; mancini; honway
Any explanation for why the Murrah Building was first on the list?

My educated guess is that it was deemed most vulnerable assuming that numerous targets were 'cased' by foot soldiers.

I think AKAL security employed only about three? folks for daytime patrols. And I think these security people covered a couple of buildings, not just the Murrah bldg.

17 posted on 06/22/2002 9:48:24 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Mertz
I think AKAL security employed only about three? folks for daytime patrols. And I think these security people covered a couple of buildings, not just the Murrah bldg.

If I'm remembering correctly, only one of those three Teg/Akal security guards was covering the Murrah building, and he'd already gone home earlier in the day on the 19th.

19 posted on 06/22/2002 9:54:38 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Mertz
Doesn't or didn't a Pakastani related private security firm handle some of the "security'at the Murrah Building in OKC ?
38 posted on 06/22/2002 12:03:28 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson