What is interesting is how you use a typical revisionist trick. Focusing on one source to pretend that all statements of a particular fact are narrow and biased. For instance you cite the
New Republic and dismiss their criticism of Saudi support for terrorism (as if fundraisers for suicide bomber families, i.e., blow up a busload of Jews and your family will be taken care of did not qualify). Funny how you ignore the scathing evaluations of Saudi support for terrorism in those ultra left publications
National Review and
The Wall Street Journal.
Then again, you certainly do want us to have open eyes, open ears, and most of all, open minds.