At this stage of the game, aren't those incredibly naive questions ? Arguing that there is no Saudi connection is about as credible as a mob mouthpiece arguing that there is no Mafia.
At this stage of the game, aren't those incredibly naive questions ? Arguing that there is no Saudi connection is about as credible as a mob mouthpiece arguing that there is no Mafia.
From the 25 rules of Disinformation:
10. Associate opponent charges with old news.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.
3....Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well.
You avoid the issue -- the specifics of the terrorism/Saudi money trail -- by using derogatory terms. you associate the specifics of the terrorism/Saudi money trail with charges of old news.
My comments and questions still stand -- this article and now you didn't address them. Your judgement and credibility is now clear too.