Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Technology For Catching Liars (LETS start with Media and Sentate,Congress)
Associated Press ^ | June 21, 2002, | By CHRISTOPHER NEWTON

Posted on 06/22/2002 7:39:11 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2002 7:39:11 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Good for me I almost never lie.
2 posted on 06/22/2002 7:41:04 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I triple dog dare little danny rather to read the news hooked up to one of these.
3 posted on 06/22/2002 7:44:03 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The article failed to mention the dreaded electic nipple clips.
4 posted on 06/22/2002 7:48:57 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian

First, the liar must hear the question and process it. Almost by instinct, a liar will first think of the true answer before devising or speaking an already devised false answer.

All that thinking adds up to a lot of electrical signals shooting back and forth. Langleben says the extra thought makes some sections of the brain light up like a bulb when viewed with an MRI.

More than fifty percent of the time when asked a question my thought process goes in many directions as well as retrieving the answer. For example, boarder guards are trained to detect eye movements that are pretty reliable in differentiating if a person is telling the truth or making something up. The procedure is simple. So when asked a question at the boarder as well as retrieving the answer I'll be thinking of the boarder guard doing the eye-consistence procedure.

5 posted on 06/22/2002 7:55:33 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
That would make my voice quiver...
6 posted on 06/22/2002 7:56:05 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The real-challenge would be making these devices democrat-proof...
7 posted on 06/22/2002 8:00:12 PM PDT by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
They use Clinton's "I never had sex with that woman" speech to calibrate the equipment.
8 posted on 06/22/2002 8:21:48 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zon
First, the liar must hear the question and process it. Almost by instinct, a liar will first think of the true answer before devising or speaking an already devised false answer.
All that thinking adds up to a lot of electrical signals shooting back and forth. Langleben says the extra thought makes some sections of the brain light up like a bulb when viewed with an MRI.

Sounds fairly simple to beat. Just always think of a lie before answering even if the answer is the truth. Everything would then read as a lie. I also wonder if the sarcastic would have an advantage here as they generally do come up with a smart answer before answering a question even if it is never voiced.

a.cricket

9 posted on 06/22/2002 8:29:46 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I have mentioned this before regarding lie-detector screenings for employees in general. What such do is guarantee that pathological liars will be found at much higher percentage than usual in the organization, indeed, dur to soical dynamics, that they will come to run the organization, that the organization will itself become pathlogical and not only easy to lie, but ourright preferring lies to any truth, no matter how inconsequential.

Pathological liars can pass these tests. These tests rely a a normal sense of shame that shame prevents a lie from being completely hidden. But pathological liars have no shame about lies, in fact lies are more comfortable to them.

10 posted on 06/22/2002 8:39:14 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Searching for the truth
11 posted on 06/22/2002 8:46:40 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: another cricket

Sounds fairly simple to beat.

It assumes people are drone-like in their thinking -- always retrieving the truth and stating it before having any additional thoughts. Their dumbing-down indoctrination hasn't been that effective and never will be.

I think the author of the article has too much unproductive time on his hands.

12 posted on 06/22/2002 9:03:12 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bvw

These tests rely a a normal sense of shame that shame prevents a lie from being completely hidden. But pathological liars have no shame about lies, in fact lies are more comfortable to them.

Most people can lie without the normal shame attached. For example, looking down the barrel of a gun and being asked a question and depending on the answer the person holding the gun says he'll pull the trigger, the victim lies without shame. Once learned it can be used in situations where a person would expect shame to be attached.

13 posted on 06/22/2002 9:11:15 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
All that thinking adds up to a lot of electrical signals shooting back and forth. Langleben says the extra thought makes some sections of the brain light up like a bulb when viewed with an MRI.

Sounds like you get scored against if you make the effort to think over your answer to be sure it's truthful.

14 posted on 06/22/2002 9:15:12 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
"Even for the smoothest-talker, lying is tough work for the brain."

If they ever plugged Willie into it, he'd put that machine in orbit.

16 posted on 06/22/2002 9:22:31 PM PDT by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller

17 posted on 06/22/2002 9:33:41 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weikel
>>>Good for me I almost never lie.<<<

Is that the truth, almost the truth, a lie, or almost a lie????

=)

18 posted on 06/22/2002 9:34:52 PM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I wonder what would happen if C-Span used this on their congressional broadcasts?
19 posted on 06/22/2002 9:36:50 PM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tourist Guy
The truth if I said never then that would be a lie.
20 posted on 06/22/2002 10:23:57 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson