To: John Jamieson
The NE story stated that there was a diary detailing homosexual activity by the Dad and the two uncles. Also said that things aren't exactly as they seem Spent a good deal of time emphasizing the strange behaviour by the family when the girl was first discovered missing---instead of calling police they called friends and neighbors
10 posted on
06/22/2002 10:33:04 PM PDT by
jnarcus
To: jnarcus
1st call after Elizabeth was "discovered" missing: The Uncle, Tom Smart.
2nd call: The Smart's Bishop.
3rd call: The police.
This thing stinks to high heaven.
To: jnarcus
The NE story stated that there was a diary detailing homosexual activity by the Dad and the two uncles. Also said that things aren't exactly as they seem I heard the father during another one of his statements in front of a microphone, and it hit me that he is lying. His fake crying-talking is no longer working for me. It is the exact same voice as Susan Smith.
There is a bombshell at the end of this story, I just know it.
To: jnarcus
I don't know if any of this stuff is true, but the Father and the uncle are very feminine acting, that is one of the first things I noticed.I think there is something very weird about this group too, just can't put my finger on what it is.
I had the gut feeling about Susan Smith also from the beginning, her tears seemed faked too.<br. I hope none of the things we might think are true, and that there is a stranger and that he returns her safe. I don't think that will happen though, sadly.
To: jnarcus
The NE story stated that there was a diary detailing homosexual activity by the Dad and the two uncles. Also said that things aren't exactly as they seem Spent a good deal of time emphasizing the strange behaviour by the family when the girl was first discovered missing---instead of calling police they called friends and neighborsSome of this is getting eerily similar to the Lindy Chamberlain case in Australia 20-25 years ago (on which the movie A Cry in the Dark is based). The woman was tried and convicted in the press and the public long before a court finally did so, then had to overturn her conviction when evidence was found that she had not killed her child. The family belonged to a religion not that common in Australia, and they were labeled as cultists and Satanists (which is as far from the truth as is imaginable). The book based on her story is called, I believe Evil Angels. She was an unlikable individual, but was not a killer.
62 posted on
06/22/2002 11:22:50 PM PDT by
Spyder
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson