This statement says it all AND could apply to Republicans/conservatives as well in the fight against RATS and socialists!!
This article also shows just how important the internet has become in the fight against bias and lies -- as if we didn't already know.
NPR's is hardly then only anti-liberty journalism; the deadline pressure and the need to grip the audience's attention inhere in free, competitive journalism itself. Journalism as a genre of literature is anticonservative.The truth is that we could figure out who to vote for by reading books and magazines, without any newspapers at all--say nothing of broadcast journalism!! Broadcasting in and of itself is a creature of the FCC; only because of the censorship of you and me does ABC et al have the priveledged address by which the people can hear and watch its programming.
Appologists for that system prattle about the public's "right to know," as if there were truly a font of wisdom spouting from--and only from--the lips of the entertainers who work for the broadcasters. But certifying "fonts of wisdom" is no part the government's business. If perchance you are more wise than Peter Jennings, how would we (or the FCC) ever figure that out? The FCC has prejudged the issue by giving ABC affiliates--and not you--all those licenses.
But of course, to speak of "wisdom" and "journalism" in the same breath is an oxymoron. What does deadline pressure do to infuse journalism with a wisdom superior to that found in nonfiction books? And how does the consensus claim of journalistic objectivity give a individual journalist the courage to challenge a journalistic consensus which happens to be in error?
Broadcast journalism should be abolished. The FCC should require that all broadcasting except for traffic, weather, and sports reports should be prerecorded a week in advance. If you want to get the very latest rumor, sign on to the unregulated Internet.