Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonF
The fact that the Clinton's were not convicted for crimes relating to Whitewater in no way esatblishes their innocence. As I recall, all their buddies got convicted. They were right in the middle of everything but others took the fall. Hillary's role was particularly well documented (once those "lost" billing records showed up).

Plenty of people stole more in the S&L fiasco but that doesn't make them innocent either.

Your defense of the Clinton's is as justifyable as those that cheered when Gotti walked, or when OJ got his pass.

Screw you. (Freeper since when???)

55 posted on 06/25/2002 9:40:54 PM PDT by mcenedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: mcenedo
"The fact that the Clinton's were not convicted for crimes relating to Whitewater in no way esatblishes their innocence."

How obvious. Perhaps you could quote any statement I made that said that I thought they were innocent.

"Your defense of the Clinton's is as justifyable as those that cheered when Gotti walked, or when OJ got his pass."

Quote where I've defended Clinton's conduct (instead of simply pointing out his legal record), while you're at it.

"Screw you. (Freeper since when???)"

Your logic and reasoning overwhelm me. Clearly, in the face of such authority, I'm in error.

62 posted on 06/26/2002 8:23:39 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson