Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO's Kosovo mission failed
The Halifax Herald ^ | 2002-06-24 | Scott Taylor

Posted on 06/25/2002 11:05:16 AM PDT by DTA

NATO's Kosovo mission failed

By Scott Taylor ON TARGET

Mitrovica, Kosovo - IT HAS BEEN three years since NATO troops first rolled into Kosovo and the last of the Yugoslav security forces withdrew from this embattled province.

At that juncture, the western media hailed NATO's intervention as the "liberation of Kosovo" and a victory for Albanian Kosovars. Many misguided military analysts proclaimed the campaign to be "proof" that overwhelming air power alone was sufficient to win modern wars.

In actual fact, unexpected Serbian defiance and the inability of NATO aircraft to locate and destroy the Yugoslav military had forced NATO to concede to then president Slobodan Milosevic's demands and negotiate a diplomatic settlement.

Originally, NATO planners had expected the Serbs to concede after five days of face-saving resistance. No one had planned for a campaign that would last 78 days without creating a crack in the Serbs' will to resist.

Likewise, despite the exaggerated daily claims of destruction by NATO spokesman Jamie Shea, the top brass knew their planes could not find the well-concealed Serbian forces in Kosovo.

Although Shea boasted of NATO pilots "killing" over 150 armoured vehicles, it was later confirmed that only 13 Yugoslav tanks were destroyed during the fighting.

Of these, five were, in fact, Second World War-vintage, U.S.-made M-10 tank destroyers, museum pieces, that were placed in fields by the Serbs as deliberate decoys.

As a result of the air campaign's failure to achieve its aims, NATO was forced to sign a peace deal with Milosevic, a man they had already indicted as a war criminal.

Under the terms of this deal (United Nations Resolution 1244), an international military occupation force in Kosovo would also include non-NATO contingents (notably the Russians, who rushed in to seize the strategic Pristina airport in advance of the NATO forces); the world would still recognize Kosovo as sovereign Yugoslav territory; the Albanian guerrilla force known as the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) was to be quickly disarmed, at which time Serbian security forces would be allowed to re-enter the province to protect historical sites and border posts; and, finally, NATO's demand to hold a referendum on Kosovo's independence "within three years" was to be postponed "indefinitely."

However, what has become obvious over the past 36 months is that NATO negotiators never had any intention of fully implementing Resolution 1244. Even after the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic's regime, it is apparent that the United Nations Mission in Kosovo is unwilling to co-operate with Yugoslav authorities.

Furthermore, the KLA was never fully disarmed and was reconstituted as the UN-funded Kosovo Protection Corps. Despite repeated protests from Yugoslav negotiators and the destruction of their religious sites, no Serbian police have been allowed to re-enter Kosovo, in spite of the fact that this province technically remains part of the sovereign territory of Yugoslavia.

More importantly, the arguments to justify NATO's military intervention continue to erode. At the time of the first bombing, we were led to believe that timely action would prevent a humanitarian crisis in Kosovo.

However, it was two days after the air strikes began that first a trickle, then a flood of refugees began pouring from the region.

With 800,000 Albanians housed in squalid refugee camps, NATO spokesman Jamie Shea told us that the bombing had to continue "because Milosevic was committing genocide."

At one stage, in order to encourage support for a military ground campaign, the U.S. State Department claimed that as many as 100,000 Albanians had been slaughtered in Kosovo. However, in the three years since NATO's occupation, United Nations forensic teams have had difficulty in identifying even 2,000 victims that would have been killed during the 78-day crisis. (This number includes over 400 Serbs and 300 other non-Albanians, and does not distinguish between combatants and civilians.)

Given the final death tally, even the newly constituted Albanian Kosovo Supreme Court ruled last month that no genocide had taken place in Kosovo, only the displacement of people.

Nevertheless, despite the presence of 40,000 NATO soldiers and 10,000 international police who patrol the province, over the past 36 months there have been 1,000 murders and 2,000 people were reported missing.

For the 239,000 Serbs who fled Kosovo in 1999, during the period of Albanian "revenge" attacks, displacement into refugee camps remains a reality. For the additional 100,000 Serbs and non-Albanians who stayed in their homes in Kosovo, they continue to live in tiny enclaves under 24-hour NATO protection.

With an unresolved refugee crisis and continued inter-ethnic violence, it is difficult to understand how NATO officials, who were responsible for the intervention, can proclaim Kosovo to be either justifiable or a success.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: balkans; kla; nato; terrorism; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2002 11:05:17 AM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Balkans
bump
2 posted on 06/25/2002 11:06:00 AM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA
NATO's Kosovo mission failed

Should be:

CLINTON's Kosovo mission failed

3 posted on 06/25/2002 11:15:26 AM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *balkans; vooch; Spar; boston_liberty; konijn; DTA; joan; oxi-nato; Hamiltonian; Fusion; Kate22; ...

James T. Phillips
Serbian children living in the Pristina ghetto are escorted daily by an armoured NATO convoy to school eight kilometres away in the Serbian enclave of Gracanica.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Canadians have had some interesting perspective on the Yugoslavia bombing.

This is a nice summary.  I like this line:

However, it was two days after the air strikes began that first a trickle, then a flood of refugees began pouring from the region.

A truth many would like to deny.

4 posted on 06/25/2002 11:19:07 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
Your posting from Croatia and you're asking us? How the hell should we know?
6 posted on 06/25/2002 11:33:53 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tropoljac
What's the solution then? Seriously...

Allow a limited Serbian police presence, and if it goes well, then allow a bigger presence, and if that goes well, then withdraw all foreign troops and give Serbia full control. Serbia would have to make some concessions, for example according to the constitution, if more than 10% of the population speaks a certain language then that has to be made an official language. Basically, they should just give the Albanians equal rights like FYROM did, and if the Albanians still complain, then that's proof right there that this was never about human rights, only establishing a greater Albania.

7 posted on 06/25/2002 11:36:23 AM PDT by The Big Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: DTA
The whole Yugoslav was another Clintoon diversion away from the latest erupting public scandal in the states. By bombing Yugoslav, NATO without authority rewrote its own charter after violating its own legal framework.
9 posted on 06/25/2002 11:39:17 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
"What's the solution then? Seriously..."

There is only one proven solution - recognize tribal nature of non-Western (and some Western) societies and split everything (Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia, Ulster, West Bank, Timor, USSR, Czechoslovakia, etc etc) (roughly) along the tribal lines establishing simple defensible borders, move people who found themselves on the wrong side of the divide, provide asylum for ethnically mixed families if they could not live in peace on either side of the border.

Say, it will be real easy to convince Serbs to split Kosovo with Albanians if they also could split Bosnia and (may be - there will be a border problem) Croatia along the existing population patterns.

Naturally, there are quite a few finer details in the arrangement to make it workable and discourage splitting of entities which actually can stay together, but IMHO this should be a general principle.

11 posted on 06/25/2002 11:41:45 AM PDT by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Kosovo is historic and heroic Christian territory.

I think that Clinton and Albright will be the last rulers and potentates that America ever has, that will bomb and murder Christians in order to advance Islamic interests and take over land for enlargement of Islam against Christendom.

What must now be done is to provide reparations for these evils of the Clintons and Albright, to Serbia and above all to the present and former Serb residents in Kosovo. Milosevic should not only be freed, he should be made dictator of Kosovo with a million Serbian and Western and Russian troops to put these Albanian butchers back into their place.

And that, of course, really IMO is hell, not just a land on earth called Albania.

13 posted on 06/25/2002 11:48:43 AM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tropoljac
My point is only that the U.S. and NATO haven't a clue and should stay away. We create more problems than we solve when we choose sides in tribal disputes which have gone on longer than our government's been in existence. Best wishes and stay well.
14 posted on 06/25/2002 11:49:47 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Besides wishing to stage a diversion from Oral Office scandels a part of the answer as to what impelled the US into Kossovo may be that we had a Prez who had the borderline personality trait of "Agressive antisocial Syndrome" which presents itself by the individual deliberately perpetrating actions which are socially tabooed. What could be more tabooed than deliberately provoking a war. Persons with this trait also manifest poor impulse control and indulge in actions which they susequently fabricate elaborate lies to justify. It is thought many do these acts simply to see if they can get away with them. One historical character that appeared to have this character flaw in a florid state was the Emperor Nero. Did the US suffer through the reign of Nero the Lesser.
15 posted on 06/25/2002 11:53:06 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
is this your view on the Israeli-Palestinian issue as well?

Absolutely.

17 posted on 06/25/2002 12:02:23 PM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
"The problem with this is that states will lack minorities who are used as tools by the greater powers, accusing them of human rights violations and so on. Minorities are a battering ram used on these states. Divide and conquer, just like in Africa when borders were created willy-nilly."

It is time to wake up, colonial times are over, the Cold War is over too, we do not need (and we have no reason to care) about either "that states" or Africa or any other place populated by warring tribes, all we want for them is not drain our resources in various peacekeeping exercises.

Also, it presents an great opportunity of peaceful development for every tribe.

19 posted on 06/25/2002 12:10:26 PM PDT by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tropoljac
Yes again! Check out anything recent by Pat Buchanan and you'll get an idea of my views.

If it were up to me, U.S. embassies would be replaced with a telephone and a fax machine.

20 posted on 06/25/2002 12:16:32 PM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson