[harrowup]

Nope, sonny. Egypt threatened to blockade Aquba but got word from DC to cool it. No way was Egypt capable of any tactical advantage in the Med.

1. No blockade.

The Syrians lobbed shells into the settlements after the settlers destroyed the Syrian crops.

2. No unprovoked attack.

As for the Jordanians? They offered the Allenby Bridge to Tel-Aviv and were dismissed.

3. No attack.

4. Go and sin no more...and if you ever call me a liar again, I'll kick your JKL arse back into the sewer.

[rmlew]

Nope, sonny. Egypt threatened to blockade Aquba but got word from DC to cool it. No way was Egypt capable of any tactical advantage in the Med.
1. No blockade.
The Egyptians closed the Straites of Tiran (Gulf of Aquaba) and Suez canal to Israeli shipping. That is a blockade.

The Syrians lobbed shells into the settlements after the settlers destroyed the Syrian crops.
Just like Israel is currently lacing Egyptian chewing gum with pheremones.
There were no "settlers" in 1967. (Unless you consider any and all of Israel a settlement.) There were only Jewish communities in internationally recognized borders.

As for the Jordanians? They offered the Allenby Bridge to Tel-Aviv and were dismissed.

Who invaded whom? Jordan invaded Israel 2 days into the war. Try again.

3. Dream on

4. What does "JKL" mean?