Interesting the Prosecution has not given it's theory how DW is supposed to have entered the house, kidnapped Danielle and disposed of the body? Didn't they "promise" in opening statements they would do just that?
If all we can do is focus on the possibility that DW became sexually aroused by the porno and put on his invisible cloak to do the dastardly deed, then we are in a rut here. Is the Prosecution going to "deliver" on its promise?
Court TV interviewed a shrink who said if DW had viewed the porno, he would have satisfied his urges (paraphrasing here) and would not have gone after Danielle...Was she saying that Porno has it's up side? We'll never know, she was cut off.
sw