Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RCW2001
Good news!
2 posted on 06/27/2002 7:08:28 AM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kryptonite
Good news!

If you hate individual rights and liberties.

3 posted on 06/27/2002 7:12:08 AM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kryptonite
I would hope you would also be in favor of a zero-tolerance policy, where upon the results of a positive test, the offender is incarcerated until he 21 without benefit or need of a trial, I mean why take baby steps when trashing constitutional protection go whole hog.
12 posted on 06/27/2002 7:18:32 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kryptonite
Yes. Thank God all vestiges of individual liberty will soon be a dusty memory for us. How could we possibly consider ourselves a free people without first forcing our children to perform an intimate bodily function in front of an adult - all before they're allowed to attend the schools that their parents' tax dollars finance?
23 posted on 06/27/2002 7:25:54 AM PDT by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kryptonite
ruling that schools' interest in ridding their campuses of drugs outweighs an individual's right to privacy.

What morons, they should be removed from the bench, every last one.

189 posted on 06/27/2002 11:23:17 AM PDT by thepitts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kryptonite
Apt screen name KRYPTONITE, for a view poisonous to liberty and justice. This ruling is just plain WRONG, but it will serve to make future generations even more tolerant of intrusive, invasive nanny - state gov't.
214 posted on 06/27/2002 4:18:11 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kryptonite
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
239 posted on 06/30/2002 7:30:26 AM PDT by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson