Another blow for corporate America [Wall Street succumbs to the Clinton Malady]

Christian Science Monitor ^ | Thursday, June 27, 2002 | By Ron Scherer and Alexandra Marks | Staff writers of The Christian Science Monitor

[JohnHuang2]

Thanks, friend

[JohnHuang2]

Clinton was out to destroy this country for personal gain and this is the result

Bull's-eye

[paulsy]

"Wall Street, in essence, succumbed to the Clinton malady."

this premise is idiotic.

[SevenDaysInMay]

At its most basic level, fascism is only corrupt socialism. The Clintons' Democrat Party is nothing if not corrupt. IMHO, Hillary is a Leninist, and as she ages badly, prone to Stalinist rages. She could only dream of the police state powers with which GW is now acting.

If Hillary or one of the Politburo becomes president, the First American Republic will end. XXX42's destruction of our Department of Justice and oral sex is not sex will have its cost to our children. The destroyed innocent lives at Mount Camel, Waco 1993 were but a harbinger.

We should fear the long-term costs of allowing the Decade of Greed & Seed. American fascism is thriving.

[MaeWest]

Fabulous analysis! Thank you JH2.
(And could I please be added to your ping list?)

[JohnHuang2]

Thanks, friend -- and, yes, I'll add your name to the list.

[norton]

Don't know where you were invested; my mother's house lost nearly half its value following the rodney king festivities and there were no 'events' in a two city radius of it (Glendale). My house dropped back to 1984 level overnight. Yes, they've recovered and more than doubled since then but lost ten years of appreciation in the meantime.

[geologist]

Thanks for expressing your clear sighted view. Excellent concise "right on" perspective of the facts.

Went to your home page ... great articles there and they are timely ... previously I was not aware you were giving/posting on your home page an on going opinion about current up to the minute happenings. Now that I know, I will check it out daily.

Thanks. You are a major contributor to this forum ... please continue ...

[JohnHuang2]

Thanks for the compliments and encouragement, friend.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Yes, they've recovered and more than doubled since then but lost ten years of appreciation in the meantime.

I don't think you quite understand. Let me tell you. One property we own was bought 10 years ago for 200K. This property is now worth 350k. Try that in the stock market, without loosing your skin. As I stated, we are in for the long haul, as we were not trying to sell. We have held onto our properties for the past 15 years and some have actually more than doubled in value. Try that in the stock market as some did, and they lost everything.

Again, we were told by some very respectable experts some years back, what was going to happen to California realestate. And they were right on the money. Sure it has a few ups and downs like everything else. But if you look at the big picture, it just goes up and up and up. Supply and demand, and they are not making anymore realestate in Southern California. It's becoming a rare commodity indeed.

[RJayneJ]

Thanks for the nomination! };^D )

[blackie]

Keep it up John, good job !!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Molon Labe !!

[norton]

Agreed...long term real estate is better than stocks in most cases.

Kingman AZ, over ten years is a loss, over fifty years probably a gain.

LA over ten is a gain, over twenty also a gain and maybe as good or better than stocks but way less than it looked prior to ol' Rodney's ride.

Issue; most people do not invest in real estate for that long a period and most who did so invested in quite damp properties with bugs and scaly critters already residing in place.

You can go broke in either event.

[JohnHuang2]

Welcome =^)

[JohnHuang2]

Your names been added.

[JohnHuang2]

Thanks, friend.

[JohnHuang2]

Btw, Freeper "RJayneJ" has kindly reserved space on her website for all of my essays: This is her homepage: BullDogBulletin

You'll find my essays here: