This could be worse than I originally thought.
You're remembering my comments about Christian abstinence and marriage that were made three or four years ago -- comments which had long ago been forgotten by their author. These comments are from an FR thread that has evidently disappeared into that Great Black Hole of cyber-space -- a thread which I can't find using Google, Hotbot, Lycos, AlltheWeb, or Dogpile. Amazing. Got some keywords handy? I'm not sure which words to use.
You may just have the entire thread handy, so if you don't mind, please post my "FR mission statement" again. I don't recall ever saying that I have "a mission at FR," even way back in '98. If you'd like, just post the entire conversation. We can pick up where we left off. :-) It may make for an extended, drawn-out 'chit-chat' because of my schedule, but it should make for some fun conversation.
But you're right about the "rape" comment. That was a poor choice of words and did a complete disservice to all women who may have suffered from any form of sexual assault at the hands of a Pig. Of course, most of us know that the huge majority of men are not Pigs and are actually very loving, affectionate creatures, so I think most readers got the drift of my comments.
By the way, that's "(kr
ch
r)" as in "a thing to behold" or "a person deserving of amazement and wonder," not as in "Big Foot .") And I'm sure you already realize that I don't mean "Pig" as in a literal "Pig" that goes "Oink, Oink," right?
I tell ya what... Let's change that nasty "rape" word to something more appropriate... more descriptive... (since you seem to be preoccupied with my sexuality).
How about this? Let's change it to: "Absolute Hang-from-the-Rafters, Mind-Blowing, Screechin' and Screamin' Sex" with my wonderful, loving husband. Is that better for you?
I know.. I know... I had promised I wasn't coming back. But now you're bringing up Sex, one of life's most gratifying experiences and a true gift from the good Lord above. Doncha think?
No ... it's not worse than you thought.
(And -- though you've always got your own Freudian interpretation of what I'm really thinking or repressing as I type -- the fact is my recollection of rank minutia where you're concerned is no different than my recollection of rank minutia where ALL and SUNDRY are concerned. Though I'm liable to screw up the names of my own family members (and so rarely make introductions as a rule), my memory bank is a veritable cross to bear. On the upside, however, it's made me extremely valuable in past incarnations as a paralegal when logging the details of complex litigation ... chronology, key documents, players and the slips of testimony I read once during summarization ... and having them in my head and available for the asking. I can't help but remember everything ... whether or not I'll consciously fog certain painful things as best I can. I noted your use of the Blood Trail to make the point I was somehow jealous of you. If your praise thereof was sincere, you know good and well I've a brain that remembers the smallest details .... eventually. =)
Anyway, if you'll remember, having understood that you were studying sex therapy or some such endeavor, I sought you out once about the potential that pornography could be useful in a clinical setting.
(Years later, after much research and contemplation, I've decided this is not the case but that's of no moment. We could kick that around on some porn thread, I guess.)
So, having relied on you thus and been grateful for your ready assistance, it became important to agree with or have respect for always my go-to Source on Sex.
Indeed, swinging from the chandelier's is definitely the better image than rape. You'll just have to forgive me if -- its being your field and all and, like me, your enjoying sex as a most sacred and pleasurable gift from God -- your casual use of the rape image shook me, that's all. No doubt my reaction was only exacerbated by my personal feelings about the subject ... if not you, Nita.
I could have made comment then but probably figured it would end up much the same stupid rigamarole as my interjection herein did thanks to your always leaping always to the personal ... and assuming my every comment or criticism stems from some repressed jealousy or enmity where you, Nita Nuprez, are concerned. (Exchanges like these being exactly the reason most of my close friends and running buddies are men.)
One last thing ... I should have addressed it yesterday, I guess but I do stand by the comments I made re: Mods and such even if the heat of the moment and my colorful style was misinterpreted by you on several counts. (Had I thought for a moment you "made up" the Tranny thing, you can rest assured I would have dogged you day in and day out instead of just blowing the whole thing off. The very idea someone could stage such a thing is abhorrent to me.)
I still think you're exactly the sort of poster any rational person would find suitable for Modding:
These are precisely the sorts of experiences, savvy and perspective I think would be most beneficial in a Mod.
(Though the temptation to build a federal case out of an unsubstantiated figment of some anonymous tipster's Byzantine recond is exactly the sort of thing to which I would hope Mods are immune as a rule. Too many games people can play in that vein.)
Bottom line ... if you can stand yet another load of what you're somehow certain is my patently duplicitous fawning ... you'd have been nigh at the top of my shortlist of choices for the team.
Trust that clears all that up.
Regards, Nita.