Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Young throws down the gauntlet on ethanol~ To Kerry..'You want ethanol, I want ANWR,'
Anchorage Daily News ^ | 6-28-2002 | Liz Ruskin

Posted on 06/28/2002 10:16:53 AM PDT by Trailer Trash

Edited on 07/07/2004 4:48:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Washington -- Alaska Congressman Don Young sounded off Thursday against senators who want to increase the nation's use of ethanol as House and Senate members met to begin negotiations on the energy bill.

"They're not going to walk over me," he vowed during the opening session of the conference committee charged with reconciling the differences between the House and Senate energy bills.


(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anwr; energylist; potus2004
Who's side is he on?
1 posted on 06/28/2002 10:16:53 AM PDT by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Part of what's wrong with government.
2 posted on 06/28/2002 10:19:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Whose side is he on?

The wrong one, naturally.

Kerry is a big "renewable" advocate, along with anything else that doesn't function well and would raise energy prices considerably.

3 posted on 06/28/2002 10:25:25 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I agree, but if an ethanol deal will get us ANWR, we should take it. The deal needs to be offered, and we must force the Dems to REJECT it. Then we do to Iowa, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Missouri to use that against the Dems in the campaign.

Hit Cleland and Torricelli as well on this.
4 posted on 06/28/2002 10:26:14 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
More to Young's point, ethanol receives a tax subsidy, so the more it replaces gasoline, the less fuel taxes flow into the Highway Trust Fund, which pays for road construction and safety improvements.

This is Young's real concern -- he wants that tax revenue!

This has nothing to do with ANWR -- my understanding is that even if it were opened tomorrow there would be no sense in drilling there unless oil was trading at $27-$33 per barrel over the long term.

5 posted on 06/28/2002 10:32:07 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Who's side is he on?

When you consider the practical results of all liberal programs, whether welfare, voting rights, energy policy, environmentalism, the farm bill, education, and on and on, you can't help but conclude that they are anti-America. All of their policies handicap our progress, slow our growth, grow our government and restrict our freedom. They are Anti-America, period!.

6 posted on 06/28/2002 10:35:15 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Ethanol doesn't make economic sense, Young said.

No, but it makes more and more sense after the 3rd glass of it.

7 posted on 06/28/2002 10:39:42 AM PDT by Palmetto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Energy_List
Bump list
8 posted on 06/28/2002 10:56:31 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
The corn-based additive is used to create cleaner-burning gasoline blends

Are they not trucking the ethanol to the refineries?

Seriously, ethanol makes great sense if you are a senator from a farm state. But the great improvements we have seen in air quality over the last several years are not due to ethanol, or MTBE, but rather to improvements in engine design. Emissions will continue to improve as engines improve, and as new engine technologies come into use.

MTBE was a make-work project the pols imposed on the oil companies, which added cost to gasoline, put some of the smaller refiners out of business, thus reducing competition, thus also raising prices.

The cost of dismantling the MTBE facilities, and the costs of trucking in ethanol, and the cost of the ethanol itself, will all add to the cost of gasoline. That will be useful, also, as senators grandstand about the rising cost of gasoline.

9 posted on 06/28/2002 11:25:51 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Trailer Trash
I want both ANWR & ethanol! It not an either/or... its a both

Gasoline & ethanol can be blended in any percentage so can Diesel and Biodiesel (vegetable oil)

Ethanol (grain alcohol) & Biodiesel (vegetable oil) are farm crops the U.S. farms out produces the world

The U.S. Government pays farmer not to produce (dumb) the Government needs to stop this and farmer need to turn any excess crop to fuel

So go open up U.S. oil drilling in ANWR, offshore, wherever you find oil in the U.S.

Make up any oil shortfall in blending in ethanol and Biodiesel (because you grow what you need)

The U.S. can be oil independent if we want and not by Government mandated electric cars or SUV killing fuel economy laws

But bottom line when crunch time happens I want to see the U.S. be able to meet its needs 100% in house

Then tell the world to pound sand

11 posted on 06/28/2002 11:48:34 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
A high school teacher in the Boston area, William R****s P***, claims that he has not voted for Kerry because he is in Ted Kennedy's district. How stupid is that? He put that in writing on a radio station's chat board.
12 posted on 06/28/2002 12:08:18 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
It takes more energy to make ethanol (raising corn needs fertilizer,pesticides,using farm equipment and heating to make ethanol)
13 posted on 06/28/2002 12:20:14 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Waskishi
I agree totally but politicians love ethanol because when gas mileage goes down gas tax revenue goes up, the farmers become dependent on the subsidy and contribute to the campaigns and vote for politicians to continue the wasteful program and most politicians justify to themselves their continued existence based on the number of laws passed and people manipulated.
14 posted on 06/29/2002 8:58:27 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson