Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Fight Down to Wire on PeacekeeperImmunity /Congress weighing legislation authorizing invade Hague
Reuters ^ | Jun. 28, 2002 | BY IRWIN ARIEFF

Posted on 06/28/2002 6:42:22 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian

UN to Fight Down to Wire on Peacekeeper Immunity

BY IRWIN ARIEFF

UNITED NATIONS - (Reuters) - The United States vowed on Friday to fight down to the wire to keep its peacekeepers out of reach of a new global war crimes court and renewed a threat to kill the U.N. mission in Bosnia if it did not get its way.

Complicating the situation, the top U.N. legal adviser suggested for the first time that a U.S. move to shutter the U.N. Bosnia mission could also close down the Balkan state's far more strategically important NATO-led multinational peacekeeping force -- a conclusion U.S. diplomats said needed further study.

The 15-nation U.N. Security Council faces a midnight Sunday deadline for renewing the Bosnia mission, which was launched in 1995 to train a professional multi-ethnic police force after Bosnia's three-year war that gave rise to the term "ethnic cleansing."

The United States has threatened to veto the resolution extending the mission if it does not provide its peacekeepers and other U.S. officials with immunity from the International Criminal Court, which comes into force on Monday.

The court is the world's first permanent legal forum created to try such crimes as genocide, gross human rights abuses and war crimes.

Council members, divided 14-1 against the U.S. position, spent Friday looking for common ground and finally gave up.

The council next meets at 4 p.m. on Sunday, just eight hours before the Bosnia mission's mandate expires.

Envoys said they could not recall the last time a Security Council fight pitted Washington against its longtime allies Britain and France. All three have permanent council seats, along with Russia and China.

SERIOUS PROBLEM

"We haven't resolved anything. The differences still remain," U.S. Deputy Ambassador James Cunningham told reporters. "We have a serious problem. We want it to be addressed."

U.S. officials said they hoped council members' governments back home would realize the seriousness of the U.S. concerns and give in.

But most council members are either among the 73 nations that have already ratified the new court or soon plan to. They say that binds them to do nothing to undermine the tribunal.

"We are being asked to choose between peacekeeping and the court, and I don't think people are willing at this point to step back from the court," said one council diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity.

President Bush, cheered on by the Pentagon and U.S. conservatives, argues the tribunal would infringe on national sovereignty and could lead to politically motivated prosecutions of its officials or soldiers working outside U.S. borders.

Bush renounced the treaty after the United States signed it while his predecessor Bill Clinton was in the White House.

The U.S. Congress is even weighing legislation authorizing U.S. forces to invade The Hague, where the court will be based, in the event prosecutors grab a U.S. national.

The United States has 46 U.S. police officers in the Bosnia mission, which U.S. officials have in the past said was vital to the U.S. "war on terrorism" as the region is known as a transit point for fundamentalist Muslim guerrillas and arms.

The United States also has 2,500 soldiers in the separate NATO-led peacekeeping contingent.

U.N. Legal Counsel Hans Corell warned the Security Council against moving to a confrontation over the U.N. mission in Bosnia without knowing the full legal ramifications and said it could inadvertently shut down the NATO-led force as well.

A U.S. official, asked about that possibility, would say only that the situation was unclear. "We are not going to leave (the NATO-led force) first thing Monday morning," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The United States, which picks up the bill for about a quarter of U.N. peacekeeping costs, has vowed to pursue the immunity question as every U.N. mission comes up for renewal.

U.S. officials have threatened to pull out of all peacekeeping missions if Washington fails to get its way.

"When you think of what the people of Bosnia have endured over the last decade, it is shameful to see the U.S. government policy shrink to this depth," said Richard Dicker, director of the International Justice Program of New York-based Human Rights Watch.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2002 6:42:22 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The U.S. Congress is even weighing legislation authorizing U.S. forces to invade The Hague

Alright! Finally Congress shows some cajones.

2 posted on 06/28/2002 6:45:15 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Can anyone explain to me why we even bother with the UN -- all we do is house these Communist, American-hating spies in our midst. Why is it exactly that we shouldn't close up shop and send them all packing?
3 posted on 06/28/2002 6:46:41 PM PDT by jrlc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The U.S. Congress is even weighing legislation authorizing U.S. forces to invade The Hague, where the court will be based, in the event prosecutors grab a U.S. national.

Isn't it easier just to cut funding for the Kangaroo Tribunal and to stop giving political support to the clowns like Carla?

4 posted on 06/28/2002 6:49:11 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Mr. President bring our soldiers home and tell Kofi Annan we are parting company
5 posted on 06/28/2002 6:59:31 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
THE U.N love this oneU.S. pilots 'the direct cause' of Canadian deaths
6 posted on 06/28/2002 7:00:16 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Bush renounced the treaty after the United States signed it while his predecessor Bill Clinton was in the White House.

Another Clinton sell out. He was not at all qualified to be a president. Not at all. He tried his best to tear down the U.S. Thankfully, he didn't quite make it. We're pulling through his reign of terror. It can only get better. I don't think it could get any worse than the way he left it.

7 posted on 06/28/2002 7:01:06 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
!!! :)
8 posted on 06/28/2002 7:09:10 PM PDT by Constitution Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
I wish they'd invade New York and give these idiots the boot.
9 posted on 06/28/2002 7:20:30 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole; Wraith
Hows about, giving Milosevic a medal and replace our troops in Kosovo with the Serbian Army? It's their country afterall. They, with Russia, and Israel would form a 'solid' core in fighting 'terrorism'. More dependable in the 'long' haul than the EU.

Hey Wraith, jump on this, you been there, what do you think, any ideas on how to get us out of this mess?

10 posted on 06/28/2002 7:26:17 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Two Iranian U.N. Workers Expelled From the United States
11 posted on 06/28/2002 7:43:12 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The moment we get a Democratic President this all goes off the table and we will drop any pressure against the court. Its like a ratchet, the Republicans just slow it down and as soon as a Democrat gets in....click.
12 posted on 06/28/2002 7:43:43 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
passing it on...

I think an MP Platoon could handle that mission....

13 posted on 06/28/2002 7:45:36 PM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Great suggestion. I would strongly support a return of the Yugoslav army to Kosovo...a lightening offensive that would capture as many KLA/MPRI as possible. The Serbs could then set up their own "war crimes" tribunal and keep the firing squads busy for a year or two.
14 posted on 06/28/2002 7:46:29 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Hows about, giving Milosevic a medal and replace our troops in Kosovo with the Serbian Army? It's their country afterall. They, with Russia, and Israel would form a 'solid' core in fighting 'terrorism'. More dependable in the 'long' haul than the EU.

Amen

There may still be time to hand Kosovo back over to its rightful owners before the UN starts demanding that we hand Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California over to Mexico on the same perverted basis.

15 posted on 06/28/2002 7:48:23 PM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
The U.S. Congress is even weighing legislation authorizing U.S. forces to invade The Hague

that would be the coolest thing i ever saw in my lifetime I am giddy just thinking about it
16 posted on 06/28/2002 7:48:56 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

17 posted on 06/28/2002 7:49:33 PM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: duckln
replace our troops in Kosovo with the Serbian Army

Wasn't that supposed to be done a couple of years ago?

18 posted on 06/28/2002 7:49:47 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Stick to your guns. US sovereignty is far more valuable to Americans than the "seats in suits" at the UN. If the UN will not exempt US personnel for the missions that they ask us to carry out, kick the UN out of the US. Let THEM enjoy Saudi Arabia!
19 posted on 06/28/2002 7:52:30 PM PDT by NetValue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
As important as this issue is, it dwarfs in comparison to the importance of ensuring that the UN does not obtain taxing authority over anyone or anything, anywhere.
20 posted on 06/28/2002 7:53:59 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson