[rdb3]

I agree that it has to be "either/or," but who are the "they" you mention?

[Lower55]

The Van Patton family?....They...

[Lower55]

There were people on the plane on the cellphones. They said they were going to attack the hijackers.

Bush said he was prepared to shoot down threatening planes. Thus, he had no reason not to say he did that, if he did.

He is not Clinton, he will tell it like it is.

The people on the plane knew it had to come down. Noone would blame Bush for taking it out, if he had. So what would be the reason for the coverup? I see no reason to lie. Clinton would have lied just for the hell o it. I don't see this in Bush.

[lasereye]

"Here is a very likely scenario," says the web site. "Bush was approving the shooting down of hijacked airliners, which led Dick Cheney to order the shooting down of Flight 93 - with all of the Heroes on board."

The web site obviously