Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Monday, July 1, 2002

Quote of the Day by Poohbah

1 posted on 07/01/2002 4:57:43 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
" And in this reaction we may finally be seeing the dangerous fruit of decades of judicial irresponsibility and tyranny, bringing us at length to the point where law abiding American citizens view the formal opinions of the federal judiciary with active contempt."

This isn't the first fruit of judicial irresponsibility and tyranny but it just might be the one that galvanizes the public.
2 posted on 07/01/2002 5:15:58 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liberty Belle
Ping
3 posted on 07/01/2002 5:26:51 AM PDT by RichardsSweetRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
...one nation under Black Robes, without liberty but justices for all.
4 posted on 07/01/2002 5:29:33 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I think Keyes misses the point here. This is a Christian nation, that built it's appreciation of God and His God given freedom into it's government, culture, and agencies.

No one can touch our freedoms legally, because they come from God not man. Because our freedoms are not man given, man cannot take them from us, a fact that guards us and makes us unique in all the world. This is what is being attacked by the courts who want to throw God off their backs and cut the bonds that hold Americans freedom in God's hand and not man's hands.

It's dangerous and irresponsible, it smacks of an agenda that seeks a power over us above the power of God, and needs to be held in the upmost contempt of court.

5 posted on 07/01/2002 5:30:47 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
bringing us at length to the point where law abiding American citizens view the formal opinions of the federal judiciary with active contempt

Profound prescience. This is a real danger. It happens here first, on FR.

6 posted on 07/01/2002 5:36:10 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Popularly discreditable opinions undermine the legitimacy and necessity of the judiciary system, often in the form of individual self-sufficiency: "we could just as well do without."
7 posted on 07/01/2002 5:39:46 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
...decisions which the majority might not agree with, but that are required by the law, by the Constitution, by the principled tradition of constitutional interpretation that the Supreme Court has fashioned. The spirit of active and vigilant citizenship that denounces corrupt, arbitrary and incompetent judicial reasoning is essential to liberty. But when that denunciation reaches the point of open and active contempt for the very office and authority of the courts, making principled but unpopular judicial decisions impossible, an equally crucial bulwark to our liberty is in danger.

Wrong, Alan. The liberal Federal judiciary has for decades been making its own unconstitutional law based "penumbras and emanations" and the chickens are now coming home to roost, that is all. This decision -- and many others in recent decades -- deserves our contempt. This reaction has been far too long in coming. It is the law itself that has been prostituted by an unprincipled Liberal federal judiciary and this "under God" fiasco is the logical continuation of a long-standing trend. The people are not at fault, Alan. The people are contemptuous of this and other rulings because these decisions and laws are unconstitutional and deserve contempt.

8 posted on 07/01/2002 5:53:37 AM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
For liberty, we need a respected judiciary.

Yes, we do, but they must earn our respect.

For the sake of preserving our liberty, we need to insist that the courts begin again to deserve the respect from a free people that makes their work possible.

Some have been trying to do this for decades, without success.

Bringing such discipline to the judiciary is, at bottom, a political task.

But the politicians have been wilful cowards, Alan, and more than willing to ignore principal.

It is one more essential job that only a principled and vigilant citizenry can accomplish.

How, Alan? BS, Alan. The Federal judiciary does not listen to us unless there is a massive outcry, such as in the current instance. If the law becomes a prostitute, should she be treated like a lady? That is hypocrisy. If Federal judges subordinate the law to their liberal agenda, as has been done for decades, by what logic does such law deserve our respect?

The liberal Federal judiciary is finding that by undermining the Constitution, they undermine the law and their own authority. This should be no surprise. But so long as the liberal Democrats in the Senate are willing to play politics with principal, this will continue to happen, and there is no sign whatever that they will "get religion". Where is our choice, Alan?

9 posted on 07/01/2002 6:25:29 AM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
btt
19 posted on 07/01/2002 2:16:11 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson