[Rodney King]

I have yet to hear a rational argument for why conservatives should not like Klayman, except that he seems to apply his standards to both sides of the aisle.

[Abundy]

So what does Klayman believe in? He describes his group's orientation as "fiercely nonpartisan, but conservative. We have a healthy skepticism about government. Unless it's watched and scrutinized, it becomes corrupt."

So what does FreeRepublic.com believe in? It is described, by a moderator, as "fiercely partisan, disguised as a conservative web site working for reduction of government. We had a healthy skepticism of government under Bill Clinton, but that's all gone now. Since George Bush is in the White House we don't need to watch and scrutinize, Government won't become corrupt."

(muttered, under their breath: "If we could just get rid of the old guard and that damn Klayman we could get on with the business of cheerleading for the Republican Party...")

Wonder how long this post will last?

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

I have yet to hear a rational argument for why conservatives should not like Klayman, except that he seems to apply his standards to both sides of the aisle.

It's because he's an incompetent fumbling boob. Far too many suits of low quality and of no importance.