Memo Cited Bush's Late SEC Filings (Here we go)

Washington Post ^ | 07/03/2002 | Mike Allen

[ladyinred]

The Enron/Bush/Big Business corruption show is on the air folks, brought to you by the friendly "I'll fight for you" folks who brought us 8 years of corruption, the DemoRAT party.
Stay tuned, let the games begin.

[Wild Irish Rogue]

This is so last century!! No one,but the Desperation Democrats are going to get excited about an archaic book keeping matter from the 80's!! It's not like it was a failed land deal, with mysterious deaths, lost and found billing records, grand jury appearances, special prosecutors, jail terms, faulty memories, 5th Amendment claims,suspicious fires in offices where records were stored, law partners going to jail,law fims dissolving, more records being found in the trunks of abandoned cars,a state governor going to jail, the feds having to bail out a savings and loan and girlfriends wearing orange jumpsuits and chains!! Now that would have been a story-too bad the New York Times and Washington Post ignored that!!

[Fracas]

Timing. Then there was no Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, in the headlines every day, and the public was not 'feeling the pain' of corporate accounting & SEC questions.

[Mo1]

*snicker* He filed some paperwork late over ten years ago? Is this the best they can do?

I guess the Rats forgot to read this part

The White House provided the first four pages of an SEC memo from 1992 which said, "Based upon our investigation, it appears that Bush did not engage in illegal insider trading because it does not appear that he possessed material nonpublic information." Bartlett said the information about the losses at issue was available only to Harken's executive committee, of which Bush was not a member.

BTW ... DOES ANYONE KNOW IF JESSE JACKSON FILED HIS RETURNS YET????

[dsutah]

I've come to my own conclusion with these people; in that they are jealous of G. Bush's success and popularity. Therefore, they have the obsessive need to get even for it on someone's behalf, B. Clinton's! If they're digging this much into old news, and throwing it in his face, they're trying to play 'gotcha' (sp?)! But it doesn't seem to be working, doesn't it? (grin)

I hope he never gives in to it; but somehow, I don't think so, not yet.

[lonestar]

They can't wait to investigate the Gores connection with Armand Hammer and Occidental--NOT!

[PhiKapMom]

Exactly!

Notice how this is all being looked at again -- when are CNN and the rest going to go after Ms. clinton's cattle futures also?