Replies

Perhaps we should look at DVD's testimony again with new eyes. He may be using the dog to cover all these issues, so Layla may indeed be the roadmap to Danielle's death....

Did she walk in on something? What fibers are in her hair, hands and body and where did they come from? (the dogbed?)

Damon had a dog that ran into his leg (or was she kicked?)....
Was not housebroken and needed to be cleaned up after (or was she?)....
She needed to shut into Derrick's room (why?).....
But DVD heard her whimper to go out (but didn't hear his daughter being kidnapped?).....
Danielle played with and walked the dog (was she the dog's favorite? Had Layla 'protected' her before and gotten kicked for it?)

Where's the dogbed? And who was DVD entertaining earlier in the evening?

The timeline seems like it was cobbled together and that a couple of witnesses missed some instructions. So now they're stuck with doors opening and closing all night long, and DVD getting up to let the dog pee, no, to pee himself, no, to move the dog from one place to the next.

Might be time to read all of those VD transcripts again. :-(

All of Layla's deeds on that night were bogus...letting her out several times was a story in case someone came forward and said the patio door was being opened and closed and Damon was in and out.

The dog bed was not destroyed by Layla..it was used to suffocate and/or carry her out of the house..the steam cleaner was used in the MB, not her room....her room was never the crime scene, which is why he had no problem preserving it...IMO

Pin..we've been going over what Damon and Brenda have said since day one. We've always come back to square one..their versions of what happened that night are questionable.

Damon and Brenda have left a trail of clues to pick up on. For one, they said way too much that we didn't need to know. Thinking ahead, covering thier asses was their main purpose. Finding her blood, urine, fingerprints would all be very natural, or is it?

Did we need to know that Danielle sleep-walked? (First alibi)...not true, tho. Did we need to know about the Potty Dance? Did we need to know that Layla tore up her dog bed? (Why did Damon say this?) Did we need to know that Danielle suffered from nose-bleeds? (Her blood was probably found in the house somewhere).. Did we need to know Damon ran into the dogs nose? Did we need to know about the vacuuming? Did we need to know Laya scratched Danielle? And on and on...They led the LE away from them...sort of like, a good offense is a good defense.

The VD's offered up way too much information that in my mind, only served to give them an alibi thereby neutralizing any clues that the child could have been harmed in the house, or by someone invited there. They had an answer already provided, even before they were asked. Very clever..these two. But they aren't SMART. LE, OTOH, was stupid..to write them off so fast.

Sorry for the long rant..I just can't stand the thought that if DW isn't the guilty party, there are OTHERS to look at, even if the idea that a parent did this, is sooo distasteful to some.