Posted on 07/03/2002 4:19:22 PM PDT by Asmodeus
LONDON, July 3 (UPI) -- The British government Wednesday unveiled controversial proposals to introduce compulsory identity cards for the first time since World War II in an attempt to combat illegal immigration and to clamp down on benefit fraud.
Home Secretary David Blunkett told Parliament that he envisioned a universal entitlement card for which everyone in Britain would register to gain the right to social services, benefits and employment.
Blunkett said he was launching a six-month consultative exercise to gauge public reaction. But one source in Prime Minister Tony Blair's office said, "We wouldn't be putting the idea forward if we did not think there was a positive reason to look at it."
Another source close to the government said Blunkett "with Blair's backing has pretty much made up his mind to go ahead with it." The document the home secretary submitted to Parliament even contained possible designs for the credit card-sized ID.
Blunkett has been working on a plan to introduce a national identity card ever since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. But he said earlier that national security should not be considered the sole reason for issuing such cards.
Britain introduced compulsory ID cards as a security measure during World War II, but they were axed in 1952 after a judge questioned their value in peacetime.
The national ID card is seen as a major weapon in the British government's battle against the growing problem of illegal immigration via Europe, most notably through the underwater Channel Tunnel rail link from France, regularly swarmed by hundreds of asylum seekers from the Sangatte refugee camp trying to get to Britain.
Blunkett's ID card initiative came a week after French Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said Britain's lack of such a document was a main reason why so many illegal immigrants where targeting it. Sarkozy also hinted strongly that France would not close down the Sangatte camp until London took appropriate action.
The U.K. home secretary did not detail the format of the proposed ID cards. One critic in the opposition Conservative Party accused him of "opaque utterances" but they are expected to include microchip biometric data such as fingerprints or iris information, as well as photos and other identification.
Blunkett said that while every Briton would have a card, they would not have to carry it with them at all times. People would have to produce the ID when requested. For instance, he added, the identity card would be a straightforward and verifiable way to establish the right to work legally.
The lack of a need for such identification has made Britain, and London in particular, appealing to illegal immigrants and tax dodgers looking for work where few, if any, questions are asked.
Blunkett told Parliament that identity fraud, including black market labor and illegal claims for dole money and other social security benefits, is costing the country an estimated $2 billion a year.
Some ordinary Britons backed this reasoning for such a card. "The only people I think who are worried about it," said retired office manager John Rawling, "are the crooks. If they won't accept identity cards, they must be on the fiddle."
Simon Soaper, a social worker, was succinct in his opposition.
"I couldn't care less if ID cards are brought in or not." he said. "As soon as I receive mine, I shall destroy it. I'll never carry one, no matter what the law says."
"If you have nothing to hide," countered shop attendant Donald Walters, "what is the big deal? The more information they could have on, the better. The sooner they bring them out, the better, and I know what I would say to the civil liberties loonies."
The civil rights group Liberty said it would oppose a national identity card. "It's unacceptable and wrong on principle," said John Wadham, a spokesman for Liberty.
Karen Bartlett, head of the pressure group Charter 88, said packaging ID cards as entitlement cards is not going to fool the public. A card, which you have to show to access services, is still an ID card, whatever spin you put on it, Bartlett said.
But I'm sure it's just coincidence.
Interesting screen name by the way.
Thanks for the post.
Well, are we surprised by the British reaction to this, given their gun laws? The ID card solution is not going to go down well in the U.S. IMHO.
The railway can make sure that they all buy tickes to get on the train, but the government can't stop them from getting out of the railway station. So the fix is to issue identity cards so that they can catch the illegals nationwide.
Riiight.
England goes the turd way.
I saw the vet put one under my K-9's skin. Only took a minute.
"He will cause all to recieve a mark in their right hand or forehead so that no man, rich or poor, free or bond, may buy or sell without the mark of the beast."
This gets to the heart of the matter. By the same circular logic above, refusing a search means you must have something to hide which then means they now have probable cause to search you. As a result, anyone can be searched at any time. In the same way, the mere existence of a national identification card sets a presumption of guilt upon anyone who refuses it. This then justifies the state to more closely monitor these individuals so that everyone ultimately gets monitored.
Sadly, the battle here was probably lost sixty years ago with the advent of the "Social Security" card. Just try to get a job or a doctor without one.
But I'm just being paranoid again, I'm sure.
My first dog that came from Germany had a number tattoo'd in his ear.
So for Nick it was compulsory, probably will be for us pretty soon too.
So that's what happened to the escaped nazis: veterinarian school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.