Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberalism and terrorism: Different stages of same disease ANN COULTER
anncoulter.org ^ | July 3, 2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/03/2002 5:08:54 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Uncle George
Great article! Thanks for the heads up!
21 posted on 07/03/2002 8:31:08 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"...forgetting, that if the latter came to world domination that THEY would be the first up against the wall."

Reminds me of a woman I know who dabbles in Islam - goes to workshops etc. She has been unfaithful to all of her husbands and had abortions instead of children. Still she insists that Islam would welcome her. I am not making this up.

22 posted on 07/03/2002 8:42:06 PM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Like everything liberals oppose but don't have a good argument for, all reasonable national security measures are called "unconstitutional." Whenever liberals are losing on substance, they pretend to be upset about process.

Through their enervating dialogues and endless concerns with constitutional process, liberals have made themselves incapable of feeling hate for the enemy. Refusing to take sides in this war, they busy themselves wailing about every security precaution taken by the Bush administration

"The most important occurrence in the life of a nation is the breaking out of a war. In war a people act as one man against foreign nations in defense of their very existence. The skill of the government, the good sense of the community, and the natural fondness that men almost always entertain for their country may be enough as long as the only object is to maintain peace in the interior of the state and to favor its internal prosperity; but that the nation may carry on a great war the people must make more numerous and painful sacrifices; and to suppose that a great number of men will of their own accord submit to these exigencies is to betray an ignorance of human nature. All the nations that have been obliged to sustain a long and serious warfare have consequently been led to augment the power of their government. Those who have not succeeded in this attempt have been subjugated. A long war almost always faces nations with this sad choice: either defeat will lead them to destruction or victory will bring them to despotism."

23 posted on 07/03/2002 8:47:29 PM PDT by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
. . . if that doesn't do it, Atlas Shrugged might be the 2x4 upside the head that'll help you grasp just how slippery the 'liberal' slope really is . . .

Yeah, but The Cat in the Hat beats Atlas Shrugged hands down not only for its intellectual value, but also for its plot design, unrelenting psychological tension, and its subtly nuanced yet compelling character development.

As a philosopher and author, Ayn Rand ranks just below whoever wrote the Sears Kenmore washer owner's guide and just above the author of The Desiderata.

24 posted on 07/03/2002 8:59:33 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Great read. She's right. Liberals aren't with us, they are against us. And its about time America told these rotten twerps to go to hell.
25 posted on 07/03/2002 9:09:40 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
The evil is real....the dumbassed buffoonery is to hide the fact, both to themselves and to others, that they are indeed evil.
26 posted on 07/03/2002 9:24:40 PM PDT by 1tin_soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Ayn Rand is a genius.

You are ingenuine.

27 posted on 07/03/2002 9:28:45 PM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Listen Up!

Ann Coulter is here to teach Conservatives how to take back this country.

Smash the Liberal Lies with Searing Wit, Merciless Ridicule and Devastating Attacks of Reason.

Never Negotiate With Evil. Kill it.

28 posted on 07/03/2002 9:33:21 PM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
If you are going to rant here...you are going to have to explain yourself. I think you are about to be flamed.
29 posted on 07/03/2002 9:47:16 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: College Repub
"Stupid is as stupid does." Forrest Gump If you're stupid and you allow evil to take place through your stupidity the end result is the same as an evil person committing that same deed. Robert Ringer's "Winning through Intimidation" has a similar example.
31 posted on 07/03/2002 10:23:36 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Yeah, but The Cat in the Hat beats Atlas Shrugged hands down not only for its intellectual value, but also for its plot design, unrelenting psychological tension, and its subtly nuanced yet compelling character development.

I would bother refuting you, but your own laughable hyperbole torpedoes you far more effectively than I could manage in four pages of exposition.

And as for the characters in Atlas Shrugged, they are the way they are because the book is an allegory. Perhaps when you reach high school and learn about such things in English class, you could come back and try again.

32 posted on 07/03/2002 10:40:08 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
Regarding the title...Comeon...there's a difference between being a dumbass baffoon and being evil!

Read the last two paragraphs again.

33 posted on 07/03/2002 10:40:35 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Columbia professor Eric Foner said: "I'm not sure which is more frightening: the horror that engulfed New York City or the apocalyptic rhetoric emanating daily from the White House."

I studied under Foner in graduate school. He was a decent guy and a legitimate authority on Civil War Reconstruction. Incredibly, he could write a historical text remarkably free of the leftist drivel for which he is well known.

Amazing how so gifted a historian and talented a writer could be such a complete idiot when it comes to political philosophy.

Forgive me for saying anything complimentary about a bona fide leftist, but the contrasts in the man are truly striking.

34 posted on 07/03/2002 10:52:49 PM PDT by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day; College Repub
Coulter writes: "..And you're not a patriot in this war until a liberal has compared you to the Taliban."

Well, she is using the logic of her extreme antagonists when she paints all liberals as pro-terrorists.

35 posted on 07/03/2002 11:23:46 PM PDT by bergson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
there's a difference between being a dumbass baffoon and being evil!

Apparently you're unaware of the banality of much evil.
36 posted on 07/03/2002 11:27:23 PM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Euro-American Scum
I will agree with you about Foner and many other leftists. And I mean leftists not liberals...there is a difference. Because in the same person, the capacity for excellence exists as does the capacity for stupidity. But many people who excel in a certain area are convinced that they are similarly talented in other areas of intellectual discourse. That does not necessarily follow as Prof Foner and others like him constantly prove.

I've had college professors who were like Foner. Some were exceptionally interesting lecturers, while being actual communists. One in particular stood out. He's dead now, but I was stunned when he defended Stalin in class once. It's a shame that intelligent people fall for the leftist line. But leftists need something to believe in also, and radical socialism is their religion.

37 posted on 07/04/2002 2:59:30 AM PDT by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: driftless
It's a shame that intelligent people fall for the leftist line. But leftists need something to believe in also, and radical socialism is their religion.

You bring up several important point in your post. Many Americans labor under the illusion that somehow, in a university education, there exists the beginning of wisdom. This is a fallacy. Wisdom comes from the inherent values the student brings to the table. And they better have said values before they get to college or the enlightenment of their education will have little more effect than a Cambodian Re-Education Camp.

Foner, for all his brilliance, honestly believed America was the most evil empire in human history and Republican administrations were no better than Hitler and the Nazi regime. This is nothing new for leftist thinkers (and you're right about the distinction between leftists and liberals).

The very fact that such people are so deluded is proof positive that the university in the 21st century is a breeding ground for treason the likes of which we have not seen this side of your garden variety Soviet Politburo. If the war on terrorism accomplishes nothing else, hopefully it will clean out this nest of traitors once and for all.

38 posted on 07/04/2002 7:31:13 AM PDT by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
You being the former, I suppose.
39 posted on 07/04/2002 6:50:12 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
No matter what defeatist tack liberals take, real Americans are behind our troops 100 percent, behind John Ashcroft 100 percent, behind locking up suspected terrorists 100 percent, behind surveillance of Arabs 100 percent.

Many good points in the article. But some are silly. May I ask a couple of questions? Do you honestly believe that everyone who is not behind John Ashcroft 100 percent is not a "real American." If Janet Reno, God forbid, were in the same situation and took the identical actions as Ashcroft, would you feel the same way? Would you read off dissenters as not being "real Americans?"

I am honestly not trying to start a fight here. But it bothers me a lot to not only be read out of the Republican Party, but to be read out of being a "real American" because there are legitimate questions about some of Ashcroft's actions. And it's not only me, it's many people like me whom I know, people who were giving money, manning phone banks, fighting lonely campus fights in the late sixties/early seventies--probably before Coulter was born--who are being read out of your doctrinaire thinking. It isn't heroism, it wasn't "suffering", it was nothing compared to VN soldiers, and it wasn't anything to be necessarily proud of: it was just the right thing to do. But it WAS lonely, bitter, and tough to get through to keep a flame alive for the johnny-come-latelies. And it is even tougher now to be tarnished with the ad hominem argument of not being "real Americans."

I suppose we are anachronisms. And we old farts will be dead soon, so the young will be ascendent. And that's good--the way it should be. But with thinking like that, I believe, the Republican Party will be an anachronism in 20 years.

40 posted on 07/04/2002 7:23:39 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson