Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
If I remember correctly, if testing the evidence somehow distroy or alters it, it must be done in from of an agent for the defense.

I believe that Mudd was upset because the material had not been given to the defense. That is why he appeared angry. Possibly will either have to throw it out as evidense or call for mistrial? A wrong procedure????Any legal beagle out there who knows for certain?
1,004 posted on 07/09/2002 5:11:41 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 995 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama
I believe that Mudd was upset because the material had not been given to the defense.

I don't believe that is why he sounded irritated. He told the defense to make the request. They don't test and then send the item to the defense. Just the report. Then the defense can obtain the item to perform their own tests if they wish. Feldman was putting on a show and the judge knew it.

1,074 posted on 07/09/2002 5:54:36 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson