[strela]

Since I'm entertaining myself for a few moments by trying to inject into your brain the ability to distinguish between fact and speculation -- no, no, say nothing of it, it's altruism -- let's switch to the Socratic method:

Does the Socratic method include the ability to recognize the use of the common question mark? Must have been a different Socrates than the one I read about.

(For the clue impaired, yes, that was indeed a question I posted).

[Taliesan]

Does the Socratic method include the ability to recognize the use of the common question mark? Must have been a different Socrates than the one I read about.

(For the clue impaired, yes, that was indeed a question I posted).

Actually, the Socratic method doesn't imply anything in particular about the reading ability of the questioner.

That said, apparently I owe you an apology. You didn't, after all, see any evidence at all that the injuries were anything other than those described in the family's statements. Did you?

And since we're clearing things up: you didn't see any evidence at all in the article that indicated the congregation was refusing to cooperate with the police. Did you?