Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Backs Leahy Amendment Against Corporate and Criminal Fraud
PHXnews - Arizona's Conservative News Site ^ | 07-10-02 | McCain

Posted on 07/10/2002 10:29:01 AM PDT by AZ Righty

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) today continued his fight against corporate corruption in the marketplace by supporting the “Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002" sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). His floor statement follows:

“Our publicly owned companies are an essential component to the economic health of our country. As we have seen over the past few months, the continued lapses of our corporate leaders, whether they are ethical, criminal or just plain ignorant, have a significant, sometimes crippling, effect on the welfare of our nation. We must make some fundamental changes in the current system of corporate oversight to protect Americans from avarice, greed, ignorance and criminal behavior.

Now is the time for Congress to restore investor confidence and take the necessary action to protect the interests of the public shareholders and place those interests above the personal interests of those entrusted with managing and advising those companies. The deterioration of the checks and balances that safeguard the public against corporate abuses must be reversed.

“We have to address the shortcomings in federal law and send the message that prosecutors now have the tools to incarcerate persons who defraud investors or alter or destroy evidence in certain Federal investigations. This amendment is a step in the right direction. It creates two new criminal statutes that would clarify current criminal laws relating to the destruction or fabrication of evidence and the preservation of financial and audit records. The Enron debacle clearly indicated that there were gaping holes in the current framework. There will be a 10 year criminal penalty for the destruction or creation of evidence with the intent to obstruct a federal investigation. There will be a new 5 year criminal penalty for the willful failure to preserve, for a minimum of five years, audit papers of companies that issue securities.

“The amendment also provides for the review and enhancement of criminal penalties in cases involving obstruction of justice and serious fraud cases. All of these actions are necessary to deter future criminal action. Until somebody responsible goes to jail for a significant amount of time, I am not sure that these people are going to get the message. Defrauding the shareholder has to carry a penalty of more than a fine. Many corporate decision-makers are making millions of dollars a year. A relatively small fine is not a deterrent; it’s a slap on the wrist. The threat of jail is a deterrent that will make people pay attention.

“This amendment also creates a new securities fraud offense. This provision makes it easier, in a limited class of cases, to prove securities fraud. Currently prosecutors are forced to resort to a patchwork of technical offenses and regulations that criminalize particular violations of securities law, or to treat the cases as generic mail or wire fraud that results in a five-year maximum penalty. This new provision would criminalize any scheme or artifice to defraud persons in connection with securities of publicly traded companies or to obtain their money or property. This new ten-year felony is comparable to existing bank and health care fraud statutes. To those who'd say that it's hard to define a scheme or artifice to defraud, I'd say that full and honest disclosure of material dealings and accounting treatments is the best way for the officers who run America’s corporations to protect themselves and those who invest in their companies. There are plenty of felony laws on the books that provide long prison terms for crimes that cause less damage than the losses to shareholders in Enron or WorldCom.

“It is important to emphasize that when criminal charges are pursued, it is not necessarily the firm that should be charged but the individuals at the helm of the corporate ship who should be prosecuted. If they are the ones making the decisions out of self-interest, they are the ones that should be held accountable. I also believe that we must protect the “corporate whistleblower” from being punished for having the moral courage to break the corporate code of silence. This amendment does that.

“This amendment also extends the current statute of limitations for matters concerning securities fraud, deceit or manipulation. The current statute of limitations for securities fraud cases is unfairly short given the complexity of many of these matters. Innocent, defrauded investors may be wrongly stopped short in their attempts to recoup their losses under current law. The existing statute of limitations for most securities fraud cases is one year after the fraud was discovered but no more than three years from the date of the fraud regardless of when it was discovered. Because this statute of limitations is so short, the worst offenders may avoid accountability and be rewarded if they can successfully cover up their misconduct for merely three years. The more complex the case, the easier it will be for these wrongdoers to get away with fraud. According to at least one state Attorney General, the current short statute of limitations has forced some states to forgo claims against Enron based on alleged securities fraud in 1997 and 1998.

“This situation essentially encourages offenders to attempt to cover up their misdeeds however they can, including by using questionable accounting procedures and financial shell games. Furthermore, in some cases, the facts of a case simply do not come to light until years after the fraud. If a person does not and cannot know they have been defrauded, it is unfair to bar them from the courthouse.

“These limitations are even more unfair when considered in light of the obstacles that current law can place between a victim and the courthouse in securities fraud cases. By the time a victim learns enough facts to file a complaint, survives a motion to dismiss, begins discovery, and learns that an additional wrongdoer or theory should be added to the case, that claim may be barred and the wrongdoer is able to avoid liability. Thus, current law sets up a perverse incentive for victims to race into court, so as not to be barred by time. Indeed, the short statute of limitations may even encourage frivolous cases, as a plaintiff operating in bad faith would have little trouble meeting the one-year deadline simply by naming every possible defendant and asserting every possible claim. We need to recognize the sophistication and complexity of modern-day schemes designed to defraud investors. It is long past time to give innocent victims a more reasonable chance to recover their losses.

“Finally, this provision amends the federal bankruptcy code to prevent the corporate wrongdoer, the CEO or CFO, from sheltering their assets under the umbrella of bankruptcy and protecting them from judgments and settlements arising from federal and state securities law violations. Too many of these highly paid corporate officers are using bankruptcy laws to protect their assets while maintaining their high-rise penthouses and ski chalets. It is time to force accountability and punish the person, not the institution, who is not willing to abide by the moral and legal codes that accompany leadership and public trust.”


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 07/10/2002 10:29:01 AM PDT by AZ Righty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
He's back!
2 posted on 07/10/2002 10:29:52 AM PDT by AZ Righty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
You Arizona FReepers need to get him outta there.
3 posted on 07/10/2002 10:31:15 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
The power to "manage" oversight is the power to control.
The power to control is always for sale.

The state of the nation's books indicates that this will make corruption worse.

4 posted on 07/10/2002 10:34:46 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Time to fire up the "Recall McCain" campaign again.
5 posted on 07/10/2002 10:36:09 AM PDT by gore_sux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
McPain never saw a democratic idea he didn't like.
6 posted on 07/10/2002 10:36:36 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
"[T]he continued lapses of our . . . leaders, whether they are ethical, criminal or just plain ignorant, have a significant, sometimes crippling, effect on the welfare of our nation."

Has there ever been a better description of John McCain and his Democrat buddies in the U.S. Senate?
7 posted on 07/10/2002 10:40:53 AM PDT by scalia_#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
Johnny McInsane --- DIWTGO!!!!
8 posted on 07/10/2002 10:42:02 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
What in the heck is WRONG with McVain? Is he sick?

It seems as if he cannot get over losing the nomination for a presidential run and is out to hurt our President at every turn!

Instead of doing this kind of garbage, grabbing for publicity, trying to outdo the President; that fat arsed, vain, arrogant, smoozing, married to a filthy rich woman, prone to temper tantrums and fits of uncontrolled anger RINO should be backing our President, praising his speech on corporate accountability, pushing the plans the President laid out FOUR MOUTHS ago on corporate accountability and behaving like a STATESMAN.

Instead, McVain apparently perfers to act like a petulant, 'I'll get you' kind of spoiled teenager. I am sick of hearing about this runt.

9 posted on 07/10/2002 10:42:51 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
Who needs al Qaeda when we have the United States Senate?
10 posted on 07/10/2002 10:43:26 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
>>>Is he sick?

yes. Afflicted with I didn't loose desease. He didn't, he was summarily defeated, and his looney ideas.

Some people never get over it.

tarpon
11 posted on 07/10/2002 10:45:01 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Funny Ben...but it's true.

Who needs to fight a war on terror while McCain is running around!
12 posted on 07/10/2002 10:45:07 AM PDT by AZ Righty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
UGH! He is such a royal McPain in the McDuff. When is his term up?
13 posted on 07/10/2002 10:46:56 AM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
On IMUS this morning, McCrazy said the President has to give more details about his Harken dealings. IMUS suggested McCrazy really really hated President Bush.....
14 posted on 07/10/2002 10:57:57 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
What makes McInsane hopping mad is he isn't the one who's President. He's never forgiven President Bush for whipping him in the Republican primaries.
15 posted on 07/10/2002 10:59:56 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
When are we going to see Congress consider a bill to control political fraud.
16 posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:16 AM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
McCain is backing Leahey?????

Oh this one smells real bad

Something is up ...

Gee John .. what kind of mess did you get yourself into this time???

17 posted on 07/10/2002 11:07:50 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Who needs al Qaeda when we have the United States Senate?

If I recall .. the Senate STILL has not passed the funding needed for our military

18 posted on 07/10/2002 11:09:19 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
Nothing to see here, move along now.

Nothing to see.

Just another democrat running for president supporting another democrat.
19 posted on 07/10/2002 11:09:50 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
Geez, I hope Cindy is greasing John up good each morning.

He really has become the Democratic Party's favorite love doll.

20 posted on 07/10/2002 11:10:55 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson