Neil, You Were Right(Letter to Neil Smith)

Back during the 2000 presidential selections, I explained to you and several other libertarian friends my reasons for supporting Texas Governor Bush for the presidency. I explained that while I'd only ever voted libertarian all of my adult life, I'd be holding my nose and punching ballot in his name -- because I knew he'd blow it, and I believed that his failure to enforce our rights as a Republicrat would best assure a third party success in 2004 or 2008. Somehow, I convinced myself that only a Republican victory and the sure-to-follow failure as a Constitutional leader would produce significant Third Party Momentum.

I was wrong. Way wrong to the point of "what the hell was I thinking" wrong. And not only did I settle my vote for the allegedly lesser evil, I involved our organization in the post-election fury over lost military votes and other Bush-getters, as well.

So I thought I'd tell you what I learned and vow that I will never -- ever, in my entire life -- vote for a Republican presidential candidate again. If a governor who signed a concealed carry bill in his state can avoid true defense of our rights and scat all over our Founders' graves while swaying hordes of people with mere lipservice to Liberty and redoubled efforts to kill her, the national party and its governing "philosophies" are so utterly subverted they're beyond salvage.

And a sad minority even notices, when it comes right down to it -- happy idiots believe what the talking head tells them, as long as the beer's not too warm.

One need only look at W's record -- and the record of his administration -- to see what these police statists are made of:

"USA PATRIOT" Act, read by few, hawked by many, pimped by the "saviour" AG, and signed by W

Homelanderschtadt Securidad, complete with "reorganization" to the tune of billions, with Liberty absolutely in the 10-ring

Pressure to deny "Supreme Court" hearing of two valid Second Amendment cases that could've dramatically helped right this country's crime problems and its identity as "land of the free"

Refusal to allow pilots to carry firearms overshadowed by willingness to deploy F-16's to kill everyone on board and whoever the wreckage destroys when the pilot's axe fails to help stave off multiple determined attackers

The "It's Gonna Last for a Really Really Really Long Time" war on (and billionically increased funding for the war on) Everything, spiced with tribunals that banish Constitutional rights for citizens who allegedly live under a Constitution

You said in late October 2000 that our rights would probably fare better under Gore than Bush -- that it might just be a good thing for all of us if Gore were to win. You may have been right about that, too -- probably so.

Under a Gore presidency, I can't help but wonder if the misnamed "USA PATRIOT" Act would've been squashed -- or at least read, and some of its worst tenets pared down. Instead, people who challenged that Dark Horse as it neared signing were labelled as unpatriotic -- as if questioning the dissolution of centuries of rights protection can be anything but good -- and Republicans toed the line in lockstep with their leadership like good little spineless ass kissers. The few that disagreed gave a valiant effort -- right up until the next paycheck rolled in, in most cases -- and it's back to business as usual with only small attempts to address the issues that would've been center stage, from "our" camp, had a Democrat tried to pull that sh*t.

Under a Gore presidency, we'd have had a Reno-type Attorney General -- probably not someone who'd pass out on stage while muttering about how sad it was that she "had to" torch little children -- but it certainly wouldn't have been John Ashban. (The AG's new nickname comes from his commitment during congressional hearings to enforce the "assault weapons" ban King George III doesn't have the intestinal fortitude to let sunset.) While a Gore-appointed Attorney General would probably have, like Ashban, insisted that the "Supreme Court" ignore its duty recently to hear the valid Second Amendment cases in both Emerson and Haney, he or she would've taken very hot heat from at least some of the Republicans, and certainly the NRA, for so doing. Instead, we've got NRA telling us SCOTUS' refusal to hear either of these worthy cases is "a victory" -- overt Bravo Sierra to anyone with half a thinking cap, but eaten up like cotton candy from the masses of wishful-thinking dolts who seemingly cannot bear to face the results of this "win" -- and establishment Republicans pretending the truck didn't run over grandma's gun collection, or banking on the fact that it did, knowing their future advisor-choreographed wailing about it will help win re-elections.

If Gore had become America's 2000 Dictator, "Homeland Security" wouldn't have the nazilike momentum for liberty's destruction that it has today -- if for no other reason than he'd be spending so much time inventing teleportation routers to interface with his internet. Gore's attempt to create some of Bush's most infringing, privacy-invasive, liberty-sapping "security measures" would've rallied the troops. Instead, the "Right" is mostly obediently going along to get along while "our side" pays W homage and pretends his nakedness is how it's supposed to be. What little anger we hear from the "radical" Republicans is tame compared to the bald, galling truth -- and many on the Left are making lots of sense these days when it comes to the things the Bush administration has done to walk all over their favored rights, assuring that their socialistic strength will grow as a result. And that doesn't even address the things that are being handed to the Left as consolation prizes for Bush having won an election with a margin smaller than the number of people you'll find in the bathrooms during the 7th inning stretch of a Major League baseball game -- the Bush Democrat-Socialist Entitlement Highway opened for business even before he was declared the victor in the election Liberty lost.

Then there's the coming vote on whether or not to let the illegal, unConstitutional so-called "Assault Weapons" ban sunset. Gore wouldn't have let it sunset, but his failure to do so would've brought gunowners out in numbers, to many worthy ends. Instead, we've got president Push -- EPC, for Evilly Politically Correct -- to not let it sunset, and a mostly quiet hayride while and after he renews it. The NRA intends to urge "The Administration" and their sometimes-rented congressmen to let the AW ban sunset because "it hasn't been effective in fighting crime" -- as if crime has any damned thing at all to do with the Second Amendment -- and when their president Boy shuts them down hard on the issue, they'll still spend millions of dollars in his failed re-election bid and guilt their gullible flock to fork over more squandered federal reserve notes "for freedom".

W's re-election will fail in 2004 -- but he won't lose to a Libertarian, and that's why I have to say I was wrong and you were right. Where I once thought Bush's destined insolence toward the liberties to which he translucently espoused loyalty would have gun owners and liberty advocates rush to go Third Party, I now understand that most people who believed W was the Second Coming are perfectly willing to dimple a chad on his behalf again even while admitting, with substantial and incriminating evidence, that he's got horns and a tail.

Any president of the united States of America who'd rather blow a hijacked plane out of the sky than let pilots shoot hijackers is downright EVIL -- dark, sadistic, malicious, power-crazed to the point of maniacal, and malignant -- and anyone who can't stare that fact squarely in the eye needs to imagine both scenarios, imagine the 3,000-ish lives lost on 9/11 due to pilot vulnerability, and deal with the reality of who benefited most from the WTC and Pentagon attacks.

If Gore had been selected in 2000, we probably wouldn't have had to see him with a beard, either -- I like beards on Real Americans, but seeing one on him was like seeing one on the school nurse while she tells you to swallow castor oil because it's good for you. Only a baclava will cover what needs covering there.

Good things will definitely happen as a result of W's presidency: libertarians and other third parties will see greater numbers in the 2004 presidential elections than they've previously recorded -- as will many lesser elections along the way and thereafter -- and the advancement of Establishment Republican Disillusion will be more apparent than ever before in our lifetimes.

But it wasn't worth throwing my vote away on the guy whose cronies told the Supreme Court not to do their jobs on behalf of the Second Amendment.

This Independence Day, one more thing I'm celebrating is my Independence from the George W. Bush administration -- it's full of, run by, propped up and fed by rabid domestic enemies.

If Gore had become America's 2000 Dictator

I stopped reading at this point. If someone seriously thinks that Bush is a dictator, then he must be expecting the knock on the door soon.

This guy forgot

Tax cut
Repeal of the estate tax
and Pro-life

to name a few. I'll be voting for GW as soon as possible. Don't get between me and a voting booth or you'll get run over.

Tax cut? You mean setting tax levels higher than they were before his dad or clinton raised them to levels they each admitted were too high?

Repeal of the estate tax? You mean eliminating the step up in basis, and establishing only a temporary one-year repeal of the estate tax, so that if nothing is done by a future congress, estate taxes will be much higher than ever, even for middle-wealth families?

I agree with the article in every respect. Unless he vetos an assault weapon ban extension, I will vote for someone else, guaranteed.

I had made up my mind to vote for Bush if it was close in my state, but the polls had Bush leading Forrest Gore by 20%, so I cast a NO vote and voted for Harry Browne. But everything I have seen of Harry Browne since then has been pathetic. If he is the best that the national LP can put out there then they just need to fold up their tents and go back to watching Star Trek re-runs.

I like L Neil Smith, and have corresponded with him via email a number of times, but his ideas will never come to fruition in this country. After ten years as a frustrated libertarian, I have come to realize that the only path to some semblance of Constitutional government in America is to reform the GOP and move them more toward the goals of the RLC (Republican Liberty Caucus).

A bit of a rant by the author, but one point comes through....

If the assult weapons ban is not allowed to sunset....

There will be alot more disgruntled gopers

Ok how about

Having someone your child can look up too
Promotes discernment and respect for life on stem cell research
Missile defense

Like I said. Just stay out of my way.

Anyone who has tried to raise funds for state level grass roots legislative action on the RKBA issue (fighting gun show bills, ccw reciprocity, state pre-emption against city ordnances, etc.) can see that with the election of GWB, complacency on this issue has sunk to all time lows. So on the basis of this issue and Shamaya's focus, it's not hard to see his frustration.

The duplicity of this administration on Emerson is nauseating. If the Clinton admonistration was doing what the Bush administration has done, conservatives wouldn't be giving him a pass on these behaviors. This is a perfect example of practicing the dialectic, giving up one's position for relationship- in this case having "our guy" in the Executive. As far as I'm concerned, the Republican party have demonstrated that they are little more than controlled opposition. These fools will keep selling the store just so they can claim they own it.

The GOP told me that if I voted for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the White House who would sign McCain- Feingold.

The GOP told me that if I voted for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the White House who would put political expediency ahead of the Constitution.

The GOP told me that if I voted for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the White House who would vote for the NEA’s agenda on education spending.

The GOP told me that if I voted for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the White House who would increase gov spending & subsidies.

The GOP told me that if I voted for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the office who would leave the Clinton executive orders in effect.

The GOP told me that if I vote for Pat Buchanan it would put a man in the White House who would be sympathetic to illegal aliens.

Well I did vote for Pat Buchanan - Every one of those things that the GOP predicted has come to pass.

If you want a good read on the war go see Pats latest on World Net Daily.

The problem is that both major parties want gun control to continue - the demos want a total ban and the Repubos only want to maintain the staus quo. That's what led to Angel's rant. I don't completely agree with the whole article, but the one thing that really sticks in my craw is the Bush administration's position on the AW sunset. Its not, however, that Bush was dishonest about that. His campaign website said he was in favor of the AW ban.

I am hopeful that we (fervent RKBA advocates, Shamaya included) can lean on Bush enough to have him change his mind. There is plenty of ammo published about the worthlessness of the 1994 federal AW ban, some of published by the US (Clinton Administration!) DOJ itself which commissioned an independent study in 1996 or so, which concluded that the ban had absolutely NO positive effect on gun crime/gun violence.

Bush's action (assuming he's re-elected)on the sunset of the AW ban (due in 2004)will tell the tale about the Repubos and gun control.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.