Posted on 07/13/2002 4:41:51 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
There is a group that seems to be based in California who call themselves the "Brown Reality Coalition". I've seen them on tv shows,and their big focus is to encourage young "Hispanics" to impregnate every white girl they can get to have sex with them,so "the brown race can take over". PLEASE note that they aren't saying "intermarry" or "mate with",but are saying "impregnate and move on to another one".
Also, as Americans we are all to some degree mongrels. In Europe and elsewhere in the world, things may be different. When Ireland or Denmark or Italy is as ethnically mixed as we are, something culturally valuable has possibly been lost. It's great to have places where people of all different backgrounds can mix and mingle and marry. When the whole world becomes that way, the result isn't "diversity" but sameness.
This lifelong New Yorker will never EVER forget his first trip to Michigan to meet the future in-laws.
The social impact is seen already in ghetto neighborhoods, with unattached black men in evidence. And it is also seen on college campuses where black women are disproportionately seen, and in the census data, when they marry white guys.
Darwin would approve
. . . except that genetically, we're speaking of people with the same parents--the males consigned to the genetic ash heap, and the females to the suburbs. We have a fundamental problem, and if the color line is indefensible and crossing it helps some individuals, still the problem for society persists. Unattached young and not-so-young males with no stake in society and nothing better to do than study Islam in jail is not good.The real crux of the matter is the culture which, if it did send Martha to college and an interracial marriage, raised Johnny to go to prison. In that scenario there is serious reason for the parents of Mr. Right to wonder about the fate of their prospective grandsons, and if nothing else bugged you that should.
Heh, there's no dog stronger than a mutt! :-)
I was describing what I see, not prescribing a comprehensive cure.
Does "I'm not X because of Y" mean "I am X, but Y isn't the reason" or "I'm not X, and Y is the reason"? Perhaps in spoken form one could distinguish by inflection; I'd think that the first meaning would be expressed with a rising inflection (anticipating giving the real reason).
Signed,
Puzzled
P.S. I still recall a time that a good friend of mine from down south saw an interracial couple (black man, white woman) up here (in Iowa) when we were at a restaurant. He asked me whether it was a common occurrence. (I had to say that I'd seen such couples a few times, but hadn't really been keeping count. Like other respondents here, I haven't personally happened across an interracial couple in which the woman is black and the man white.)
No breasts, no a-s, nerdy. Give me a Brasiliera anyday of the week...
I could be off base, but it seems I read some survey to that effect.
It's kind of weird but those mixes usually look more white than hispanic. Even where one of the parents is quite dark, the kids look more anglo in most cases so their plan isn't going to work that well.
You must have gone to the Philippines like I did.
Ah ha, Mafree, I know Troy Donahue was one of them right? :)
Latin women too, although at least Latin women don't generally insult or fight with their man in public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.