Replies

Hello again Dennis!

Sorry to disrupt your disruption, but where this lawsuit says "...every secret regulation that demands identification from innocent citizens, or restricts their domestic travel. Such regulations are unconstitutional because they are unpublished; require government agents to search and seize citizens who are not suspected of crimes; burden the rights to travel, associate, and petition the government; and discriminate against those who choose anonymity. ", They are absolutely correct.

Either we live in a constitutional republic which respects the rule of law and the limits our constitution places on our goverment, or...

or we have neither a constitutional republic nor respect for the limits our constitution places on our government.

From this and other postings, I would have to assume you must prefer the latter. Please say it ain't so.

You really need to be catapulted into a 3rd world pesthole where you can find out what 'statism' is all about. Even Europe would do.

This lawsuit is all about a loudmouth Losertarian getting to strut his stuff. Just like godless Michael Newdow. For most Losertarians their god is their self.

"Such regulations are unconstitutional because they are unpublished; require government agents to search and seize citizens who are not suspected of crimes; burden the rights to travel, associate, and petition the government; and discriminate against those who choose anonymity."

One must assume then that you believe that it is unconstitutional for passengers to be required to show identification, to allow their baggage to be searched, and to pass through metal detectors prior to boarding a commercial aircraft. I suppose you believe terrorists have a right to carry bombs and firearms on-board aircraft as well.